Women are more sensitive than men to prior trial events on the Stop-signal task.

Sexual dimorphism in the brain and cognition is a topic of widespread interest. Many studies of sex differences have focused on visuospatial and verbal abilities, but few studies have investigated sex differences in executive functions. We examined two key components of executive function - response...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:British Journal of Psychology Vol. 105; no. 2; pp. 254 - 273
Autores principales: Thakkar, Katharine N., Congdon, Eliza, Poldrack, Russell A., Sabb, Fred W., London, Edythe D., Cannon, Tyrone D., Bilder, Robert M.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell May2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=95683392&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 95683392
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00071269
        BJP
      jtl: British Journal of Psychology
      issn: 00071269
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2014
      vid: 105
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        95683392
        10.1111/bjop.12034
      ppf: 254
      ppct: 19
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 338KB
      tig:
        atl: Women are more sensitive than men to prior trial events on the Stop-signal task.
      aug:
        au:
          Thakkar, Katharine N.
          Congdon, Eliza
          Poldrack, Russell A.
          Sabb, Fred W.
          London, Edythe D.
          Cannon, Tyrone D.
          Bilder, Robert M.
        affil:
          Semel Institute, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), USA
          Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville Tennessee, USA
          Departments of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Psychology, and Psychopharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), USA
          Departments of Psychology and Neurobiology, University of Texas at Austin, USA
      su:
        Age distribution
        Cognition
        Men
        Sex distribution
        Women
        Task performance
        Chi-squared test
        Probability theory
        Reaction time
        Research funding
        Descriptive statistics
      sug:
        subj:
          Age distribution
          Cognition
          Men
          Sex distribution
          Women
          Task performance
          Chi-squared test
          Probability theory
          Reaction time
          Research funding
          Descriptive statistics
      ab: Sexual dimorphism in the brain and cognition is a topic of widespread interest. Many studies of sex differences have focused on visuospatial and verbal abilities, but few studies have investigated sex differences in executive functions. We examined two key components of executive function - response inhibition and response monitoring - in healthy men ( n = 285) and women ( n = 346) performing the Stop-signal task. In this task, participants are required to make a key press to a stimulus, unless a tone is presented at some delay following the initial stimulus presentation; on these infrequent trials, participants are instructed to inhibit their planned response. Response inhibition was assessed with an estimate of the latency needed to inhibit a response (stop-signal reaction time), and response monitoring was measured by calculating the degree to which participants adjusted their reaction times based on the immediately preceding trial (e.g., speeding following correct trials and slowing following errors). There were no sex differences in overall accuracy or response inhibition, but women showed greater sensitivity to trial history. Women sped up more than men following correct ' Go' trials, and slowed down more than men following errors. These small but statistically significant effects ( Cohen's d = 0.25-0.3) suggest more flexible adjustments in speed-accuracy trade-offs in women and greater cognitive flexibility associated with the responsive control of action.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N