Service users' views of the Research Active Programme.
Background The Research Active Programme (RAP) was an eight-week group-based research training programme designed to promote disability rights in research by providing opportunities for people with intellectual disabilities to become co-researchers. This article presents an evaluation of the effecti...
| Published in: | Learning Disability Practice Vol. 17; no. 4; pp. 22 - 29 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Published: |
Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom (The)
May2014
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=95807541&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 95807541 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 14658712 FTU jtl: Learning Disability Practice issn: 14658712 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: May2014 vid: 17 iid: 4 pid: 6040 pub: Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom (The) artinfo: ui: 95807541 103936751 103936751 10.7748/ldp2014.04.17.4.22.e1511 95807541 ppf: 22 ppct: 7 formats: tig: atl: Service users' views of the Research Active Programme. aug: au: Carey, Eileen Salmon, Nancy Higgins, Aideen affil: Lecturer, Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick sug: subj: Consumer Participation Persons with Intellectual Disabilities Education Research Personnel Program Evaluation Human Interviews Intellectual Disability Conceptual Framework Ireland Young Adult Adult Middle Age Descriptive Statistics Learning Methods Adult: 19-44 years Middle Aged: 45-64 years ab: Background The Research Active Programme (RAP) was an eight-week group-based research training programme designed to promote disability rights in research by providing opportunities for people with intellectual disabilities to become co-researchers. This article presents an evaluation of the effectiveness of the RAP from the perspectives of 14 students. Methods Data collection involved individual pre- and post-programme interviews and weekly post-session group feedback with all 14 RAP students. Interviews were transcribed and analysed. Results Students' interests, abilities and learning styles were identified and used alongside continual feedback to guide the curriculum design. Students' perspectives are presented under four domains: foundations to learning, responsive curriculum development, content learning and complementary learning. Conclusions From the students' perspectives, the RAP was a worthwhile investment for them. Participating in the programme provided access to a wider social network in a third-level educational environment and created opportunities for lifelong learners interested in becoming co-researchers. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|