Revisión de Crisipo de la teoría estoica del destino.
This paper is devoted to the Chrysippean revision of the stoic theory of fate. In order to do so, I will examine in the first place an objection directed toward this theory known as the Lazy Argument. According to this objection, if we claim that fate's mechanism is always fatalistic, we would have...
| Published in: | Revista Estudios de Filosofía no. 48; pp. 129 - 150 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Universidad de Antioquia, Instituto de Filosofia
dec2013
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=95851428&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 95851428 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 01213628 8WTD jtl: Revista Estudios de Filosofía issn: 01213628 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: dec2013 iid: 48 pid: 62552 pub: Universidad de Antioquia, Instituto de Filosofia artinfo: ui: 95851428 10.17533/udea.ef.18354 ppf: 129 ppct: 21 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 13.3MB tig: atl: Revisión de Crisipo de la teoría estoica del destino. aug: au: Gómez Espíndola, Laura Liliana affil: Departamento de Filosofía Universidad del Valle Cali, Colombia su: Fate & fatalism Determinism (Philosophy) Conflict of interests Chrysippus, ca. 280 B.C.-207 or 6 B.C. Stoicism sug: subj: Fate & fatalism Determinism (Philosophy) Conflict of interests Chrysippus, ca. 280 B.C.-207 or 6 B.C. Stoicism keyword: co-fated events determinism fatalism Fate Lazy Argument Argumento Perezoso Destino determinismo eventos codestinados fatalismo ab: This paper is devoted to the Chrysippean revision of the stoic theory of fate. In order to do so, I will examine in the first place an objection directed toward this theory known as the Lazy Argument. According to this objection, if we claim that fate's mechanism is always fatalistic, we would have to conclude that all our desires and efforts are meaningless. It will be suggested that Chrysippus developed his distinction between fated and cofated events in order to limit the fatalistic mechanism of fate to one group of events, and hence avoid this objection. Secondly, it will be shown how this proposal leads him to conceive a new theory of fate focused on the causal nexus of everything, which allows him to defend a conception of the world as a unity both in a synchronic and in a diachronic level. Este articulo está dedicado a la revisión que Crisipo hizo a la teoría estoica del destino. Para ello se examinará en primer lugar una objeción a la teoría, que es conocida como Argumento Perezoso. De acuerdo con ésta, si sostenemos que el destino tiene siempre un mecanismo fatalista, tendríamos que concluir que ninguno de nuestros deseos y esfuerzos tiene importancia. Se sugerirá que Crisipo desarrolló su distinción entre eventos destinados y codestinados para limitar el mecanismo fatalista del destino a tan sólo un grupo de sucesos y escapar a esta critica. En segundo lugar se mostrará cómo esta propuesta lo llevó a concebir una nueva teoría del destino centrada en el nexo causal de todas las cosas, que le permitía defender una concepción del mundo como unidad tanto en un nivel sincrónico como en uno diacrónico. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: Spanish refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Revista Estudios de Filosofía is the property of Universidad de Antioquia, Instituto de Filosofia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Revista Estudios de Filosofía holder: Universidad de Antioquia, Instituto de Filosofia dt: @attributes: year: 2013 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|