A Philosophy of Science for the Twenty-First Century.

Two major reasons feminists are concerned with science relate to science's social effects: that science can be a powerful ally in the struggle for equality for women; and that all too frequently science has been a generator and perpetuator of inequality. This concern with the social effects of scien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophy of Science Vol. 70; no. 1; pp. 1 - 15
Autor principal: Kourany, Janet A.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Cambridge University Press Jan2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=9600052&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 9600052
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318248
        PSC
      jtl: Philosophy of Science
      issn: 00318248
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2003
      vid: 70
      iid: 1
      pid: 15979
      pub: Cambridge University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        9600052
        10.1086/367864
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 14
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 70KB
      tig:
        atl: A Philosophy of Science for the Twenty-First Century.
      aug:
        au: Kourany, Janet A.
      su:
        Feminists
        Science
        Women
        Equality
        Philosophy
      sug:
        subj:
          Feminists
          Science
          Women
          Equality
          Philosophy
      ab: Two major reasons feminists are concerned with science relate to science's social effects: that science can be a powerful ally in the struggle for equality for women; and that all too frequently science has been a generator and perpetuator of inequality. This concern with the social effects of science leads feminists to a different mode of appraising science from the purely epistemic one prized by most contemporary philosophers of science. The upshot, I suggest, is a new program for philosophy of science, a program for a socially responsible philosophy of science.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophy of Science
      holder: Cambridge University Press
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2003
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N