Why Dennett cannot explain what it is to adopt the intentional stance.

Discusses Daniel Dennett's notion of intentional states. Argument of Dennett that intentional states should not be thought of resembling theoretical entities; Major virtue of Dennett's theory; Adaption by Dennett of Ludwig Wittgenstein's theory of intentional stance; Loopholes of Dennett's philosoph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophical Quarterly Vol. 46; no. 182; pp. 93 - 99
Autor principal: Slors, Marc
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Jan96
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=9601313189&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 9601313189
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318094
        PHQ
      jtl: Philosophical Quarterly
      issn: 00318094
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan96
      vid: 46
      iid: 182
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        9601313189
        10.2307/2956311
      ppf: 93
      ppct: 6
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 289KB
      tig:
        atl: Why Dennett cannot explain what it is to adopt the intentional stance.
      aug:
        au: Slors, Marc
        affil: Utrecht University
      su:
        Intentionality (Philosophy)
        Dennett, Daniel Clement, 1942-
      sug:
        subj:
          Intentionality (Philosophy)
          Dennett, Daniel Clement, 1942-
      ab: Discusses Daniel Dennett's notion of intentional states. Argument of Dennett that intentional states should not be thought of resembling theoretical entities; Major virtue of Dennett's theory; Adaption by Dennett of Ludwig Wittgenstein's theory of intentional stance; Loopholes of Dennett's philosophical tenets.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: © 2019 Scots Philosophical Association and the University of St. Andrews.
      item: Philosophical Quarterly
      holder: Oxford University Press / USA
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 1996
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N