Lobbying after 9/11: Policy Regime Emergence and Interest Group Mobilization.
Does the emergence of a new boundary-spanning policy regime shift the focus of well-established organized interests, or does it mobilize new ones? In this article, I show that interest groups with a presence in Washington before 9/11 rapidly-but temporarily-shift their attention to the homeland secu...
| Publicado en: | Policy Studies Journal Vol. 42; no. 2; pp. 226 - 248 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
May2014
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=96017094&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 96017094 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0190292X PSJ jtl: Policy Studies Journal issn: 0190292X maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: May2014 vid: 42 iid: 2 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 96017094 10.1111/psj.12057 ppf: 226 ppct: 22 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 400KB tig: atl: Lobbying after 9/11: Policy Regime Emergence and Interest Group Mobilization. aug: au: LaPira, Timothy M. su: United States United States. Dept. of Homeland Security Pressure groups National security Lobbying Bureaucracy Political organizations Government agency reorganization Twenty-first century sug: subj: Pressure groups National security Lobbying Bureaucracy United States United States. Dept. of Homeland Security Public Relations Agencies National Security Environment, Conservation and Wildlife Organizations Other Social Advocacy Organizations Social advocacy organizations Human Rights Organizations Political Organizations Political organizations Government agency reorganization Twenty-first century keyword: government demand homeland security interest groups lobbying policy regime subsystem government demand homeland security interest groups lobbying policy regime subsystem ab: Does the emergence of a new boundary-spanning policy regime shift the focus of well-established organized interests, or does it mobilize new ones? In this article, I show that interest groups with a presence in Washington before 9/11 rapidly-but temporarily-shift their attention to the homeland security issues. Established groups' entrenchment in antecedent subsystems appears to buffer against widespread policy disruption and interest upheaval. However, a new set of previously latent groups opportunistically mobilizes after the regime is institutionalized. Newly mobilized groups replace those that retreat back to the regime's antecedent subsystems. Though the policy regime fails to resolve the jurisdictional turf conflicts that triggered its creation, the institutionalization of homeland security generates its own original, distinct government demand for lobbying. Interests that previously had no business in Washington before 9/11 took advantage of the new opportunities the regime offered without supplanting interests established long before the Department of Homeland Security and its congressional committees existed. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|