The specificity of learned parallelism in dual-memory retrieval.
Retrieval of two responses from one visually presented cue occurs sequentially at the outset of dual-retrieval practice. Exclusively for subjects who adopt a mode of grouping (i.e., synchronizing) their response execution, however, reaction times after dual-retrieval practice indicate a shift to lea...
| Publicado en: | Memory & Cognition Vol. 42; no. 4; pp. 552 - 570 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
May2014
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=96064943&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 96064943 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0090502X MEG jtl: Memory & Cognition issn: 0090502X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: May2014 vid: 42 iid: 4 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 96064943 10.3758/s13421-013-0382-x ppf: 552 ppct: 18 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 679KB tig: atl: The specificity of learned parallelism in dual-memory retrieval. aug: au: Strobach, Tilo Schubert, Torsten Pashler, Harold Rickard, Timothy affil: Humboldt University, Berlin Germany University of California, San Diego, La Jolla USA su: California Analysis of variance College students Memory Reaction time Research funding T-test (Statistics) Prompts (Psychology) Descriptive statistics sug: subj: Analysis of variance College students Memory California Reaction time Research funding T-test (Statistics) Prompts (Psychology) Descriptive statistics keyword: Chunked retrieval Cued retrieval Dual-retrieval practice Parallel retrieval Chunked retrieval Cued retrieval Dual-retrieval practice Parallel retrieval ab: Retrieval of two responses from one visually presented cue occurs sequentially at the outset of dual-retrieval practice. Exclusively for subjects who adopt a mode of grouping (i.e., synchronizing) their response execution, however, reaction times after dual-retrieval practice indicate a shift to learned retrieval parallelism (e.g., Nino & Rickard, in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 373-388, ). In the present study, we investigated how this learned parallelism is achieved and why it appears to occur only for subjects who group their responses. Two main accounts were considered: a task-level versus a cue-level account. The task-level account assumes that learned retrieval parallelism occurs at the level of the task as a whole and is not limited to practiced cues. Grouping response execution may thus promote a general shift to parallel retrieval following practice. The cue-level account states that learned retrieval parallelism is specific to practiced cues. This type of parallelism may result from cue-specific response chunking that occurs uniquely as a consequence of grouped response execution. The results of two experiments favored the second account and were best interpreted in terms of a structural bottleneck model. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|