Data Fabrication and Falsification and Empiricist Philosophy of Science.

Scientists have rules pertaining to data fabrication and falsification that are enforced with significant punishments, such as loss of funding, termination of employment, or imprisonment. These rules pertain to data that describe observable and unobservable entities. In this commentary I argue that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Science & Engineering Ethics Vol. 20; no. 2; pp. 423 - 432
Autor principal: Resnik, David
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Jun2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=96202217&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 96202217
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13533452
        GNI
      jtl: Science & Engineering Ethics
      issn: 13533452
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2014
      vid: 20
      iid: 2
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        96202217
        10.1007/s11948-013-9466-z
      ppf: 423
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 141KB
      tig:
        atl: Data Fabrication and Falsification and Empiricist Philosophy of Science.
      aug:
        au: Resnik, David
        affil: NIEHS/NIH, 111 Alexander Drive, Mail Drop CU 03 Research Triangle Park 27709 USA
      su:
        Falsification of data
        Empiricism
        Realism
        Van Fraassen, Bas C., 1941-
        Philosophy of science
        Research
      sug:
        subj:
          Falsification of data
          Empiricism
          Realism
          Van Fraassen, Bas C., 1941-
          Philosophy of science
          Research
      keyword:
        Data fabrication and falsification
        Ethics
        Observation/theory distinction
        Scientific practice
      ab: Scientists have rules pertaining to data fabrication and falsification that are enforced with significant punishments, such as loss of funding, termination of employment, or imprisonment. These rules pertain to data that describe observable and unobservable entities. In this commentary I argue that scientists would not adopt rules that impose harsh penalties on researchers for data fabrication or falsification unless they believed that an aim of scientific research is to develop true theories and hypotheses about entities that exist, including unobservable ones. This argument presents a challenge for constructive empiricists, such as van Fraassen. Constructive empiricists need to be able to explain why rules pertaining to data fabrication and falsification do not threaten their philosophy of science.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Science & Engineering Ethics is a copyright of Springer, 2014. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Science & Engineering Ethics
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2014
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N