Minimal Model Explanations.

This article discusses minimal model explanations, which we argue are distinct from various causal, mechanical, difference-making, and so on, strategies prominent in the philosophical literature. We contend that what accounts for the explanatory power of these models is not that they have certain fe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophy of Science Vol. 81; no. 3; pp. 349 - 377
Autores principales: Batterman, Robert W., Rice, Collin C.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Cambridge University Press Jul2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=96705260&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 96705260
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318248
        PSC
      jtl: Philosophy of Science
      issn: 00318248
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2014
      vid: 81
      iid: 3
      pid: 15979
      pub: Cambridge University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        96705260
        10.1086/676677
      ppf: 349
      ppct: 28
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.3MB
      tig:
        atl: Minimal Model Explanations.
      aug:
        au:
          Batterman, Robert W.
          Rice, Collin C.
      su:
        Scientific models
        Philosophical literature
        Behavior
        Philosophy
        Humanities
      sug:
        subj:
          Scientific models
          Philosophical literature
          Behavior
          Philosophy
          Humanities
      ab: This article discusses minimal model explanations, which we argue are distinct from various causal, mechanical, difference-making, and so on, strategies prominent in the philosophical literature. We contend that what accounts for the explanatory power of these models is not that they have certain features in common with real systems. Rather, the models are explanatory because of a story about why a class of systems will all display the same large-scale behavior because the details that distinguish them are irrelevant. This story explains patterns across extremely diverse systems and shows how minimal models can be used to understand real systems.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophy of Science
      holder: Cambridge University Press
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2014
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N