The Grammaticalization of Daimome at Iliad 24.194.
Homer's use of the address form δαιμονίη for Hekabe at Iliad 24.194, has been particularly troublesome, and these problems have remained largely unresolved because the word's etymology, its later use, and its generally negative tone contrast with the otherwise non-confrontational tone of Priam's spe...
| Publicado en: | Mnemosyne Vol. 67; no. 3; pp. 353 - 370 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Brill Academic Publishers
2014
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=96813283&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 96813283 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00267074 MNM jtl: Mnemosyne issn: 00267074 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: 2014 vid: 67 iid: 3 pid: 639 pub: Brill Academic Publishers artinfo: ui: 96813283 10.1163/1568525X-12341203 ppf: 353 ppct: 17 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 10.1MB tig: atl: The Grammaticalization of Daimome at Iliad 24.194. aug: au: Brown, H. Paul affil: Gettysburg College, Department of Classics, 300 N. Washington St., Box 394, Gettysburg, PA, USA su: Grammaticalization Greek etymology Homer, fl. ca. 900 B.C.-ca. 801 B.C. Daimonie (The Greek word) Syntax (Grammar) Pragmatics Vocative case sug: subj: Grammaticalization Greek etymology Homer, fl. ca. 900 B.C.-ca. 801 B.C. Daimonie (The Greek word) Syntax (Grammar) Pragmatics Vocative case keyword: daimonie discourse function grammaticalization Homer pragmatics vocative ab: Homer's use of the address form δαιμονίη for Hekabe at Iliad 24.194, has been particularly troublesome, and these problems have remained largely unresolved because the word's etymology, its later use, and its generally negative tone contrast with the otherwise non-confrontational tone of Priam's speech at IL 24.194-199. This mismatch has led to a wide range of interpretations, and no general consensus. In this paper I argue that the term here appears to be undergoing grammaticalization in the direction of a discourse particle, and as such does not characterize the addressee but the context of Priam's subsequent speech. Although use of the term by later authors shows that this process was terminated, nevertheless, the development of δαιμόνιε proposed here patterns with that of other divine address forms such as Latin mehercule! and edepol!, French mon Dieu!, English oh my God!, etc. which have come to function like other discourse particles such as wow! pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Mnemosyne is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Mnemosyne holder: Brill Academic Publishers dt: @attributes: year: 2014 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|