Epistemic justification in the context of pursuit: a coherentist approach.

The aim of this paper is to offer an account of epistemic justification suitable for the context of theory pursuit, that is, for the context in which new scientific ideas, possibly incompatible with the already established theories, emerge and are pursued by scientists. We will frame our account par...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Synthese Vol. 191; no. 13; pp. 3111 - 3142
Autores principales: Šešelja, Dunja, Straßer, Christian
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Sep2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=97287317&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 97287317
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00397857
        4LI
      jtl: Synthese
      issn: 00397857
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2014
      vid: 191
      iid: 13
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        97287317
        10.1007/s11229-014-0476-4
      ppf: 3111
      ppct: 31
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 291KB
      tig:
        atl: Epistemic justification in the context of pursuit: a coherentist approach.
      aug:
        au:
          Šešelja, Dunja
          Straßer, Christian
        affil: Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science, Ghent University, Ghent Belgium
      su:
        Epistemic logic
        Sense of coherence
        Inconsistency (Logic)
        Explanatory style (Psychology)
        Robust control
      sug:
        subj:
          Epistemic logic
          Sense of coherence
          Inconsistency (Logic)
          Explanatory style (Psychology)
          Robust control
      keyword:
        Bonjour
        Coherence
        Epistemic justification
        Explanatory power
        Inconsistency
        Pursuit worthiness
        Robustness
      ab: The aim of this paper is to offer an account of epistemic justification suitable for the context of theory pursuit, that is, for the context in which new scientific ideas, possibly incompatible with the already established theories, emerge and are pursued by scientists. We will frame our account paradigmatically on the basis of one of the influential systems of epistemic justification: Laurence Bonjour's coherence theory of justification. The idea underlying our approach is to develop a set of criteria which indicate that the pursued system is promising of contributing to the epistemic goal of robustness of scientific knowledge and of developing into a candidate for acceptance. In order to realize this we will (a) adjust the scope of Bonjour's standards-consistency, inferential density, and explanatory power, and (b) complement them by the requirement of a programmatic character. In this way we allow for the evaluation of the 'potential coherence' of the given epistemic system.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2014. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Synthese
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2014
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N