Pecat amagat és mitg perdonat.... La polèmica entre mossèn Gudiol i Antoni Bulbena arran de les edicions bibliòfiles de llibres eròtics.

In December 1911 appeared in the local press in Vic (a town near Barcelona) an article that raised an uproar in the bibliophile circles all over Catalonia. A priest (an Art historian and great moralist) accused a well-known editor of fine books, without naming him, of editing luxury books of pornogr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Scripta no. 3; pp. 250 - 291
Autor principal: DOMÈNECH, ALBERT
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Scripta jun2014
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=97289426&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 97289426
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        23404841
        GD46
      jtl: Scripta
      issn: 23404841
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: jun2014
      iid: 3
      pid: 89094
      pub: Scripta
    artinfo:
      ui:
        97289426
        10.7203/SCRIPTA.3.3829
      ppf: 250
      ppct: 41
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 2.1MB
      tig:
        atl: Pecat amagat és mitg perdonat.... La polèmica entre mossèn Gudiol i Antoni Bulbena arran de les edicions bibliòfiles de llibres eròtics.
      aug:
        au: DOMÈNECH, ALBERT
      sug:
      keyword:
        Bibliophilism
        censorship
        correspondence
        erotic literature
        pornography
        Reverend Gudiol
        Bibliofília
        Bibliophilism
        Bulbena
        censorship
        Censura
        correspondence
        erotic literature
        literatura eròtica
        Mossèn Gudiol
        pornografia
        pornography
        relació epistolar
        Reverend Gudiol
      ab:
        In December 1911 appeared in the local press in Vic (a town near Barcelona) an article that raised an uproar in the bibliophile circles all over Catalonia. A priest (an Art historian and great moralist) accused a well-known editor of fine books, without naming him, of editing luxury books of pornographic content. This anecdote serves us to find out who this editor was, how much truth there was in the «accusation» and how the censored editor took the fact of being exposed to public shame. The correspondence between the priest and the editor, facilitated by a common friend, helps us analyze the arguments of both parties. We can grasp how the vast frame that embraces love literature to clearly pornographic works was perceived, both from the most conservative moral to a moderate free-thinking perspective.
        El desembre de 1911 aparegué a la premsa local de Vic un article que va aixecar molta polseguera entre els bibliòfils de tot Catalunya. Un mossèn -historiador de l'art i gran moralistaacusava un conegut editor de llibres de bibliofília -sense dir-ne el nom-, d'editar llibres luxosos de contingut priàpic (pornogràfic). Aquest fet anecdòtic ens serveix per saber qui era l'editor esmentat, què hi havia de cert en l'»acusació» i com va encaixar el vituperat veure's exposat a la vergonya pública. La correspondència creuada entre els dos protagonistes, exclusivament per mitjà d'un amic comú, ens facilita l'anàlisi de l'argumentari de l'un i de l'altre. Això ens permet copsar com s'entenia, des de la moral més conservadora a la d'un moderat lliurepensament, l'ampli arc que va de la literatura de temàtica amorosa a les obres clarament pornogràfiques.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: Catalan
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Scripta is the property of Scripta and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Scripta
      holder: Scripta
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2014
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N