Recognizing Nonhuman Morality.

Claims that some sorts of genuine moral behavior exist in nonhuman beings are increasingly common. Many people, however, remain unconvinced, despite growing acceptance of the remarkable behavioral complexity of animals and despite the admission that there may be significant differences between human...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Between the Species: A Journal for the Study of Philosophy & Animals Vol. 17; no. 1; pp. 85 - 108
Autor principal: COGHLAN, SIMON
Formato: Essay
Publicado: Between the Species Jun2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=97449727&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 97449727
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        19458487
        1GN1
      jtl: Between the Species: A Journal for the Study of Philosophy & Animals
      issn: 19458487
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2014
      vid: 17
      iid: 1
      pid: 26472
      pub: Between the Species
    artinfo:
      ui: 97449727
      ppf: 85
      ppct: 23
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 3.1MB
      tig:
        atl: Recognizing Nonhuman Morality.
      aug:
        au: COGHLAN, SIMON
        affil: Australia Catholic University
      su:
        Animal behavior
        Animal cognition
        Animal psychology
        Biocomplexity
        Animal culture
      sug:
        subj:
          Animal behavior
          Animal cognition
          Animal psychology
          Biocomplexity
          Animal culture
      ab: Claims that some sorts of genuine moral behavior exist in nonhuman beings are increasingly common. Many people, however, remain unconvinced, despite growing acceptance of the remarkable behavioral complexity of animals and despite the admission that there may be significant differences between human and nonhuman moral behavior. This paper argues that the rejection of "moral animals" is misplaced. Yet at the same time, it attempts to show how the philosophical task of exhibiting the possibility of nonhuman moral behavior is often misguided, leaving claims about nonhuman morality unnecessarily exposed to philosophical rejection.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Essay
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Between the Species: A Journal for the Study of Philosophy & Animals is the property of Between the Species and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Between the Species: A Journal for the Study of Philosophy & Animals
      holder: Between the Species
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2014
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N