Adaptation to nonlinear frequency compression in normal-hearing adults: A comparison of training approaches.
Objective: To identify which training approach, if any, is most effective for improving perception of frequency-compressed speech. Design: A between-subject design using repeated measures. Study sample: Forty young adults with normal hearing were randomly allocated to one of four groups: a training...
| Publicado en: | International Journal of Audiology Vol. 53; no. 10; pp. 719 - 730 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts randomized controlled trial Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Oct2014
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=97983228&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 97983228 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 14992027 JW2 jtl: International Journal of Audiology issn: 14992027 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Oct2014 vid: 53 iid: 10 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 97983228 97983228 97983228 10.3109/14992027.2014.921338 97983228 ppf: 719 ppct: 11 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Adaptation to nonlinear frequency compression in normal-hearing adults: A comparison of training approaches. aug: au: Dickinson, Ann-Marie Baker, Richard Siciliano, Catherine Munro, Kevin J. affil: * School of Psychological Sciences, the University of Manchester, UK sug: subj: Rehabilitation of Persons with Hearing Loss Evaluation Human Adult Randomized Controlled Trials Test-Retest Reliability One-Way Analysis of Variance Research Methodology Adult: 19-44 years ab: Objective: To identify which training approach, if any, is most effective for improving perception of frequency-compressed speech. Design: A between-subject design using repeated measures. Study sample: Forty young adults with normal hearing were randomly allocated to one of four groups: a training group (sentence or consonant) or a control group (passive exposure or test-only). Test and training material differed in terms of material and speaker. Results: On average, sentence training and passive exposure led to significantly improved sentence recognition (11.0% and 11.7%, respectively) compared with the consonant training group (2.5%) and test-only group (0.4%), whilst, consonant training led to significantly improved consonant recognition (8.8%) compared with the sentence training group (1.9%), passive exposure group (2.8%), and test-only group (0.8%). Conclusions: Sentence training led to improved sentence recognition, whilst consonant training led to improved consonant recognition. This suggests learning transferred between speakers and material but not stimuli. Passive exposure to sentence material led to an improvement in sentence recognition that was equivalent to gains from active training. This suggests that it may be possible to adapt passively to frequency-compressed speech. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts randomized controlled trial Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|