LEVINS AND THE LURE OF ARTIFICIAL WORLDS.
What is it about simulation models that has led some practitioners to treat them as potential sources of empirical data on the real-world systems being simulated; that is, to treat simulations as 'artificial worlds' within which to perform computational 'experiments'? Here we use the work of Richard...
| Publicado en: | Monist Vol. 97; no. 3; pp. 301 - 321 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Oxford University Press / USA
Jul2014
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| Sumario: | What is it about simulation models that has led some practitioners to treat them as potential sources of empirical data on the real-world systems being simulated; that is, to treat simulations as 'artificial worlds' within which to perform computational 'experiments'? Here we use the work of Richard Levins as a starting point in identifying the appeal of this model building strategy, and proceed to account for why this appeal is strongest for computational modellers. This analysis suggests a perspective on simulation modelling that makes room for 'artificial worlds' as legitimate science without having to accept that they should be treated as sources of empirical data. |
|---|