Pass the Bucks: Credit, Blame, and the Global Competition for Investment.

Both countries and subnational governments commonly engage in competition for mobile capital, offering generous incentives to attract investment. Existing economics research has suggested that these tax incentives have a limited ability to affect investment patterns and are often excessively costly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:International Studies Quarterly Vol. 58; no. 3; pp. 433 - 448
Autores principales: Jensen, Nathan M., Malesky, Edmund, Medina, Mariana, Ozdemir, Ugur
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Sep2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=98285770&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 98285770
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00208833
        ISQ
      jtl: International Studies Quarterly
      issn: 00208833
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2014
      vid: 58
      iid: 3
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        98285770
        10.1111/isqu.12106
      ppf: 433
      ppct: 15
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            db: hlh
            ui: 98285770
      tig:
        atl: Pass the Bucks: Credit, Blame, and the Global Competition for Investment.
      aug:
        au:
          Jensen, Nathan M.
          Malesky, Edmund
          Medina, Mariana
          Ozdemir, Ugur
        affil:
          Washington University in St. Louis
          Duke University
          Iowa State University
          Istanbul Bilgi University
      su:
        United States
        Economic globalization
        Economic policy
        Tax incentives
        U.S. states politics & government
        United States governors
        Economics & politics
        U.S. states
      sug:
        subj:
          Economic globalization
          Economic policy
          United States
          Executive Offices
          Tax incentives
          U.S. states politics & government
          United States governors
          Economics & politics
          U.S. states
      ab: Both countries and subnational governments commonly engage in competition for mobile capital, offering generous incentives to attract investment. Existing economics research has suggested that these tax incentives have a limited ability to affect investment patterns and are often excessively costly when measured against the amount of investment and jobs created. In this paper, we argue instead that the 'competition' for capital can be politically beneficial to incumbent politicians. Building off work on electoral pandering, we argue that incentives allow politicians to take credit for firms' investment decisions. We test the empirical implications of this theory using a nationwide Internet survey, which employs a randomized experiment to test how voters evaluate the performance of incumbent US governors. Our findings illustrate a critical political benefit of offering such incentives. Politicians can use these incentives to take credit for investment flowing into their districts and to minimize the political fallout when investors choose to locate elsewhere.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N