'FUTURE PAST': TIME AND TELEOLOGY IN (ANCIENT) HISTORIOGRAPHY.

ABSTRACT The historian's account of the past is strongly shaped by the future of the events narrated. The telos, that is, the vantage point from which the past is envisaged, influences the selection of the material as well as its arrangement. Although the telos is past for historians and readers, it...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:History & Theory Vol. 53; no. 3; pp. 309 - 331
Autor principal: GRETHLEIN, JONAS
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Oct2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=98643681&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 98643681
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00182656
        HAT
      jtl: History & Theory
      issn: 00182656
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2014
      vid: 53
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        98643681
        10.1111/hith.10715
      ppf: 309
      ppct: 22
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 421KB
      tig:
        atl: 'FUTURE PAST': TIME AND TELEOLOGY IN (ANCIENT) HISTORIOGRAPHY.
      aug:
        au: GRETHLEIN, JONAS
        affil: Heidelberg University
      su:
        Ancient history -- Historiography
        Narratives
        Teleology
        Retrospective studies
        Poststructuralism
      sug:
        subj:
          Ancient history -- Historiography
          Narratives
          Teleology
          Retrospective studies
          Poststructuralism
      keyword:
        “future past”
        'future past'
        (ancient) historiography
        narrative
        post‐structuralism
        post-structuralism
        presence
        retrospect
        time
      ab: ABSTRACT The historian's account of the past is strongly shaped by the future of the events narrated. The telos, that is, the vantage point from which the past is envisaged, influences the selection of the material as well as its arrangement. Although the telos is past for historians and readers, it is future for historical agents. The term 'future past,' coined by Reinhart Koselleck to highlight the fact that the future was seen differently before the Sattelzeit, also lends itself to capturing this asymmetry and elucidating its ramifications for the writing of history. The first part of the essay elaborates on the notion of 'future past': besides considering its significance and pitfalls, I offset it against the perspectivity of historical knowledge and the concept of narrative 'closure' (I). Then the works of two ancient historians, Polybius and Sallust, serve as test cases that illustrate the intricacies of 'future past.' Neither has received much credit for intellectual sophistication in scholarship, and yet the different narrative strategies Polybius and Sallust deploy reveal profound reflections on the temporal dynamics of writing history (II). Although the issue of 'future past' is particularly pertinent to the strongly narrative historiography of antiquity, the controversy about the end of the Roman Republic demonstrates that it also applies to the works of modern historians (III). Finally, I will argue that 'future past' alerts us to an aspect of how we relate to the past that is in danger of being obliterated in the current debate on 'presence' and history. The past is present in customs, relics, and rituals, but the historiographical construction of the past is predicated on a complex hermeneutical operation that involves the choice of a telos. The concept of 'future past' also differs from post-structuralist theories through its emphasis on time. Retrospect calms the flow of time, but is unable to arrest it fully, as the openness of the past survives in the form of 'future past' (IV).
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of History & Theory is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: History & Theory
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2014
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N