Politics, Science and the Spruce Budworm in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia.

Conclusions about the role of scientific knowledge in shaping environmental policy, such as the acid rain case, have tended to focus on contemporary events and to suggest the responsiveness of governments to scientific research. This article looks instead at the scientific evidence of acidification...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Canadian Studies Vol. 37; no. 2; pp. 164 - 192
Autores principales: Sandberg, L. Anders, Clancy, Peter
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: University of Toronto Press Summer2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=9871186&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 9871186
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00219495
        JCS
      jtl: Journal of Canadian Studies
      issn: 00219495
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Summer2002
      vid: 37
      iid: 2
      pid: 678
      pub: University of Toronto Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        9871186
        10.3138/jcs.37.2.164
      ppf: 164
      ppct: 28
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1.5MB
      tig:
        atl: Politics, Science and the Spruce Budworm in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia.
      aug:
        au:
          Sandberg, L. Anders
          Clancy, Peter
      su:
        Western spruce budworm
        Environmental protection
        Environmental policy
        New Brunswick
        Nova Scotia
        Canada
      sug:
        subj:
          New Brunswick
          Nova Scotia
          Canada
          Western spruce budworm
          Environmental protection
          Environmental policy
      ab: Conclusions about the role of scientific knowledge in shaping environmental policy, such as the acid rain case, have tended to focus on contemporary events and to suggest the responsiveness of governments to scientific research. This article looks instead at the scientific evidence of acidification problems in Ontario prior to the 1970s, indeed back to the 1920s, and considers the lack of governmental response to a mounting body of scientific evidence over the twentieth century regarding forest damage from sulphur fumes. Until the 1970s the evidence was consistently disregarded or set aside by policy-makers intent on ensuring the Ontario smelter industry continue in unrestricted fashion. This case study reveals how science, rather than be an effective influence for such change, can be ignored in the making of public policy and how further research can displace policy change.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Journal of Canadian Studies is the property of University of Toronto Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Journal of Canadian Studies
      holder: University of Toronto Press
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2002
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N