Commitment, crime, and the responsive bystander: effect of the commitment form and conformism.

Research has shown that eliciting commitment is a valuable way of inciting people to act, even in emergencies and dangerous situations. The purpose of the two studies presented here was to explore the relation between the form of commitment used to prevent a crime and the moderating effect exerted b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Psychology, Crime & Law Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 1 - 9
Autores principales: Guéguen, Nicolas, Dupré, Mickaël, Georget, Patrice, Sénémeaud, Cécile
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Jan2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=99207924&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 99207924
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        1068316X
        7WL
      jtl: Psychology, Crime & Law
      issn: 1068316X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2015
      vid: 21
      iid: 1
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        99207924
        10.1080/1068316X.2014.902457
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 8
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Commitment, crime, and the responsive bystander: effect of the commitment form and conformism.
      aug:
        au:
          Guéguen, Nicolas
          Dupré, Mickaël
          Georget, Patrice
          Sénémeaud, Cécile
        affil:
          Business Department, Université de Bretagne-Sud, Vannes, France
          Psychology Department, Université de Caen, Caen, France
      su:
        Commitment (Psychology)
        Crime
        Bystander effect (Psychology)
        Conformity
        Victims
        Automated teller machines
      sug:
        subj:
          Commitment (Psychology)
          Crime
          Bystander effect (Psychology)
          Conformity
          Victims
          Computer and peripheral equipment manufacturing
          All other building equipment contractors
          Computer Terminal and Other Computer Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing
          Office and store machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers
          Office Equipment Merchant Wholesalers
          Other financial transactions processing and clearing house activities
          Other Building Equipment Contractors
          Automated teller machines
      keyword:
        bystander
        commitment
        conformity
        crime
        intervention
        responsibility
        bystander
        commitment
        conformity
        crime
        intervention
        responsibility
      ab: Research has shown that eliciting commitment is a valuable way of inciting people to act, even in emergencies and dangerous situations. The purpose of the two studies presented here was to explore the relation between the form of commitment used to prevent a crime and the moderating effect exerted by the number of passive observers of this crime. At a bus stop, a first confederate put a bag down on the ground upon arriving and immediately left to withdraw money from an automated teller machine near the bus stop. Two male participants were present at the bus stop. In Study 1, the confederate said nothing (control), directly asked one participant to watch his bag (direct commitment), or asked all present to watch his bag (indirect commitment). About 30 seconds later, a male confederate walked up to the victim's bag, picked it up, and quickly walked away in the opposite direction of the victim. A total of 150 participants (50 per condition) were observed. It was found that 34% intervened in the control condition, 88% in the direct commitment condition, and 56% in the indirect commitment condition. In Study 2, 150 participants (50 per condition) were observed while two male confederates were present at the bus stop with the instruction not to react to the theft. It was found that more intervention was found in the direct commitment condition (88%) than in the control condition (18%). However, the indirect commitment condition did not elicit higher intervention (22%). Variation in the level of personal responsibility to help the victim is used to explain these differences.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N