Split brains: no headache for the soul theorist.

Split brains that result in two simultaneous streams of consciousness cut off from each other are wrongly held to be grounds for doubting the existence of the divinely created soul. The mistake is based on two related errors: first, a failure to appreciate the soul's dependence upon neurological fun...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Religious Studies Vol. 50; no. 4; pp. 487 - 504
Autores principales: HERSHENOV, DAVID B., TAYLOR, ADAM P.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Cambridge University Press Dec2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=99233601&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 99233601
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00344125
        RGS
      jtl: Religious Studies
      issn: 00344125
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2014
      vid: 50
      iid: 4
      pid: 15979
      pub: Cambridge University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        99233601
        10.1017/S0034412514000109
      ppf: 487
      ppct: 17
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Split brains: no headache for the soul theorist.
      aug:
        au:
          HERSHENOV, DAVID B.
          TAYLOR, ADAM P.
        affil:
          Department of Philosophy, University at Buffalo, Buffalo NY, 14217, USA e-mail: dh25@buffalo.edu
          Department of History, Philosophy and Religious Studies, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, 58108–6050, USA e-mail: aptaylor@gmail.com
      su:
        Split brain
        Consciousness & religion
        Soul
        Neurology
        Brain function localization
      sug:
        subj:
          Split brain
          Consciousness & religion
          Soul
          Neurology
          Brain function localization
      ab: Split brains that result in two simultaneous streams of consciousness cut off from each other are wrongly held to be grounds for doubting the existence of the divinely created soul. The mistake is based on two related errors: first, a failure to appreciate the soul's dependence upon neurological functioning; second, a fallacious belief that if the soul is simple, i.e. without parts, then there must be a unity to its thought, all of its thoughts being potentially accessible to reflection or even unreflective causal interactions. But a soul theorist can allow neurological events to keep some conscious thoughts unavailable to others.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2014
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N