ATTRIBUTING THE NON-PECUNIARY DAMAGE SUFFERED BY ORGANS TO CORPORATE CLAIMANTS: ORIENTAL DAILY PUBLISHER LTD V MING PAO HOLDINGS LTD.
As injury to feelings is said to be the essence of an award of aggravated damages, a conclusion that a company itself cannot be a victim of such damage is hard to fault. That said, it is without doubt that the human components of the company, in particular its directors, can experience distress and...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Corporate Law Studies Vol. 14; no. 2; pp. 479 - 492 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Oct2014
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=99422059&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 99422059 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 14735970 3IJT jtl: Journal of Corporate Law Studies issn: 14735970 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Oct2014 vid: 14 iid: 2 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 99422059 10.5235/14735970.14.2.479 ppf: 479 ppct: 13 formats: tig: atl: ATTRIBUTING THE NON-PECUNIARY DAMAGE SUFFERED BY ORGANS TO CORPORATE CLAIMANTS: ORIENTAL DAILY PUBLISHER LTD V MING PAO HOLDINGS LTD. aug: au: WILCOX, VANESSA affil: Researcher, European Centre of Tort and Insurance Law and Institute for European Tort Law, Austrian Academy of Sciences su: England Boards of directors Business ethics Courts Corruption Damage mitigation (Law) Status (Law) sug: subj: Boards of directors Business ethics Courts Corruption England Courts Damage mitigation (Law) Status (Law) ab: As injury to feelings is said to be the essence of an award of aggravated damages, a conclusion that a company itself cannot be a victim of such damage is hard to fault. That said, it is without doubt that the human components of the company, in particular its directors, can experience distress and anxiety brought about by the defendant's conduct before or during an action. This note examines a case in which the issue of whether such damage can be attributed to the company for the purpose of computing its nonpecuniary injury arose and speculates on how English courts would rule should such a question come before them. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|