Clines, Clusters, and Clades in the Race Debate.
In this paper, I argue against Andreasen and Sesardic, who have both claimed that recent cluster results in population genetics serve as evidence that the human species contains, or at least once contained, subspecies. I show that the cluster results are in fact evidentially inert relative to each a...
| Publicado en: | Philosophy of Science Vol. 81; no. 5; pp. 1053 - 1066 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
Dec2014
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=99660747&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 99660747 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00318248 PSC jtl: Philosophy of Science issn: 00318248 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2014 vid: 81 iid: 5 pid: 15979 pub: Cambridge University Press artinfo: ui: 99660747 10.1086/677695 ppf: 1053 ppct: 13 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 293KB tig: atl: Clines, Clusters, and Clades in the Race Debate. aug: au: Kopec, Matthew su: Clines Cladistic analysis Population genetics Human population genetics Human genetics Human beings Andreasen, Robin Sesardic, Neven sug: subj: Clines Cladistic analysis Population genetics Human population genetics Human genetics Human beings Andreasen, Robin Sesardic, Neven ab: In this paper, I argue against Andreasen and Sesardic, who have both claimed that recent cluster results in population genetics serve as evidence that the human species contains, or at least once contained, subspecies. I show that the cluster results are in fact evidentially inert relative to each author's preferred subspecies concept. I then sketch the kinds of biological facts that could be used to push the debate further. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Philosophy of Science holder: Cambridge University Press dt: @attributes: year: 2014 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|