Critical rationalism and engineering: methodology.

Engineering deals with different problem situations than science, and theories in engineering are different to theories in science. So, the growth of knowledge in engineering is also different to that in science. Nonetheless, methodological issues in engineering epistemology can be explored by adapt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Synthese Vol. 192; no. 1; pp. 337 - 363
Autor principal: Staples, Mark
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Jan2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=99730405&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 99730405
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00397857
        4LI
      jtl: Synthese
      issn: 00397857
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2015
      vid: 192
      iid: 1
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        99730405
        10.1007/s11229-014-0571-6
      ppf: 337
      ppct: 26
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 233KB
      tig:
        atl: Critical rationalism and engineering: methodology.
      aug:
        au: Staples, Mark
      su:
        Rationalism
        Engineering
        Falsification
        Social epistemology
        Taxonomy
      sug:
        subj:
          Rationalism
          Engineering
          Falsification
          Social epistemology
          Taxonomy
      keyword:
        Critical rationalism
        Methodology
      ab: Engineering deals with different problem situations than science, and theories in engineering are different to theories in science. So, the growth of knowledge in engineering is also different to that in science. Nonetheless, methodological issues in engineering epistemology can be explored by adapting frameworks already established in the philosophy of science. In this paper I use critical rationalism and Popper's three worlds framework to investigate error elimination and the growth of knowledge in engineering. I discuss engineering failure arising from the falsification of engineering theories, and present taxonomies of the sources of falsification and responses to falsification in engineering. From this I discuss contexts of research and design in engineering, ad hoc rescue of engineering theories, and engineering assurance.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2015. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Synthese
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2015
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N