Intermediaries and Local Knowledge in a Changing Political Environment: Complaints from Libya at the Turn of the 20th Century.

As historiography on Ottoman Tripolitania and Benghazi focuses mainly on the Italian invasion and on the Sanüsiyya and pays little attention to Ottoman records, studies on political practice and change in that period are rare. However, the special circumstances of that remote and sparsely populated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Welt des Islams Vol. 54; no. 3/4; pp. 322 - 363
Autor principal: Sievert, Henning
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Brill Academic Publishers 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=99990653&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 99990653
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00432539
        C6V
      jtl: Welt des Islams
      issn: 00432539
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2014
      vid: 54
      iid: 3/4
      pid: 639
      pub: Brill Academic Publishers
    artinfo:
      ui:
        99990653
        10.1163/15700607-05434P03
      ppf: 322
      ppct: 41
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 15.3MB
      tig:
        atl: Intermediaries and Local Knowledge in a Changing Political Environment: Complaints from Libya at the Turn of the 20th Century.
      aug:
        au: Sievert, Henning
      su:
        Complaints & complaining
        Imperialism
        Historiography
        Tripolitania
        Benghazi (Libya)
      sug:
        subj:
          Tripolitania
          Benghazi (Libya)
          Complaints & complaining
          Imperialism
          Historiography
      keyword:
        communication
        complaints
        cultural translation
        intermediary
        legitimacy
        Libya
        local knowledge
        Ottoman Empire
        political language
        sociopolitical order
      ab: As historiography on Ottoman Tripolitania and Benghazi focuses mainly on the Italian invasion and on the Sanüsiyya and pays little attention to Ottoman records, studies on political practice and change in that period are rare. However, the special circumstances of that remote and sparsely populated part of the empire enable us to focus on the role of intermediaries and complaints within the imperial framework. Complaints and related correspondence were crucial in the negotiation of order, both from the government's and from the subjects' point of view. With the 19th-century reforms, new notions of order emerged, and old notions were modified. The new mode of politics did not, however, consist of immutable prescriptions but could acquire new layers of meaning in a process of translation into the vernacular politics of the Libyan provinces and vice versa. Imperial notions of order were thus read and utilised in various ways. The key interpreters and translators in this process were intermediaries between imperial, provincial and local levels. This contribution suggests to study political communication within the imperial framework by focussing on these intermediaries.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Welt des Islams is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Welt des Islams
      holder: Brill Academic Publishers
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2014
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N