|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000cab a2200000 a 4500 |
| 001 |
024539 |
| 003 |
UAHC_CL |
| 005 |
20170810115908.0 |
| 008 |
010731b xx j 000 1 eng |
| 952 |
|
|
|0 0
|1 0
|4 0
|6 AM___ANTHROPOL_02_00_000000000000000
|7 0
|8 General
|9 49066
|a BC
|b BC
|c General
|d 2017-08-03
|l 0
|o AM. ANTHROPOL.-02/00
|p FICTICIO150
|r 2019-01-08 00:00:00
|t 1
|w 2017-08-03
|y REVA
|
| 999 |
|
|
|c 24539
|d 24539
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a UAHC_CL
|c UAHC_CL
|d UAHC_CL
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Otterbein, Keith F.
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Five feuds :
|b an analysis of homicides en Eastern Kentucky in the late nineteenth century.
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Arlington
|b American Antropological Association
|c 2000
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a En: American Anthropologist. -- Vol. 102 No. 2 (junio 2000), pp. 231-243. ISSN 00027294
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Kentucky feuds are an example of market-based feuding, one of two major types of feuding. Compensation is not paid for a homicide in regions where a local market system is linked to the world system. Feuding kinship groups in Kentucky struggle to eliminate each other, whereas in regions where compensation is paid functional/equilibrium theories are used to explain the balance that seems to occur between kinship groups. The trouble case method is used to analyze five Kentucky feuds. Episodes or homicidal encounters are placed within feud sequences. Encounters include ambushes, gunfights, house attacks, encounter battles, and arranged battles. Although each feud differs greatly from the others, the structure of the Kentucky feud is delineated.
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a MORTALIDAD
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a HOMICIDIOS
|z ESTADOS UNIDOS
|
| 773 |
0 |
|
|t American anthropologist
|w 024522
|
| 900 |
|
|
|a AM. ANTHROPOL.-02/00
|
| 942 |
|
|
|c REVA
|2 ddc
|