|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000cab a2200000 a 4500 |
| 001 |
024545 |
| 003 |
UAHC_CL |
| 005 |
20170810105935.0 |
| 008 |
010731b xx j 000 1 eng |
| 952 |
|
|
|0 0
|1 0
|4 0
|6 AM___ANTHROPOL_02_99_000000000000000
|7 0
|8 General
|9 49072
|a BC
|b BC
|c General
|d 2017-08-03
|l 0
|o AM. ANTHROPOL.-02/99
|p FICTICIO157
|r 2019-01-08 00:00:00
|t 1
|w 2017-08-03
|y REVA
|
| 999 |
|
|
|c 24545
|d 24545
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a UAHC_CL
|c UAHC_CL
|d UAHC_CL
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Fienup-Riordan, Ann
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Collaboration on display :
|b a Yup´ik Eskimo exhibit at three national museums.
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Arlington
|b American Antropological Association
|c 1999
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a En: American Anthropologist. -- Vol. 101 No. 2 (junio 1999), pp. 374-378. ISSN 00027294
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a In the following pages I describe what happens when an exhibit dense in local meanings enters the national arena. The Yup'ik mask exhibit Agayuliyararput (Our Way of Making Prayer) began as "visual repatriation"Ñbringing objects out of museums back into a local contextÑand ended as a tribal exhibit displayed in three very different majority institutions, including an American Indian museum, a natural history museum, and an art museum. The mask exhibit was developed as a three-way collaboration between Yup'ik community members, an anthropologist, and museum professionals. As it traveled farther from home, not only the objects but the process that produced the exhibit were differently presented. While majority institutions chase the language of collaboration, their institutional structures constrain how such collaborations are played out. For the "insider's perspective" of a locally grounded exhibit to survive, majority institutions must not only display the results of collaboration, but participate in the process.
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a MUSEOS DE ARTE
|
| 773 |
0 |
|
|t American anthropologist
|w 024522
|
| 900 |
|
|
|a AM. ANTHROPOL.-02/99
|
| 942 |
|
|
|c REVA
|2 ddc
|