Why study a Greek vase-painter?ña response to Whitley's 'Beazley as theorist' /

John Oakley defends the legacy of Beazley in response to James Whitley's recent analysis of Beazley and his followers (ANTIQUITY 72: 40Ð47). The debate demonstrates how influential some past figures of archaeological methodology still are, and how diverse are the approaches of modern scholars in int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Oakley, John H.
Formato: Analitica de revista
Lenguaje:inglés
Materias:

MARC

LEADER 00000cab a2200000 a 4500
001 025445
003 UAHC_CL
005 20180807113622.0
008 050614b xx j 000 1 eng
952 |0 0  |1 0  |4 0  |6 ANTIQUITY_275_98_000000000000000  |7 0  |8 General  |9 51609  |a BC  |b BC  |c General  |d 2017-08-03  |l 0  |o ANTIQUITY-275/98  |p FICTICIO425  |r 2019-01-08 00:00:00  |t 1  |w 2017-08-03  |y REVA 
999 |c 25445  |d 25445 
040 |a UAHC_CL  |c UAHC_CL  |d UAHC_CL 
100 1 |a Oakley, John H. 
245 1 0 |a Why study a Greek vase-painter?ña response to Whitley's 'Beazley as theorist' /  |c John H. Oakley. 
500 |a Antiquity 72 (1999): 209-213 
520 |a John Oakley defends the legacy of Beazley in response to James Whitley's recent analysis of Beazley and his followers (ANTIQUITY 72: 40Ð47). The debate demonstrates how influential some past figures of archaeological methodology still are, and how diverse are the approaches of modern scholars in interpreting and using their legacy. 
653 |a ANTROPOLOGIA 
773 0 |t Anthropology Today.  |w 025359 
900 |a ANTIQUITY-275/98 
942 |c REVA  |2 ddc