Megamarsupial extinction : the carrying capacity argument /

An ancient and contentious debate in prehistory (Owen 1846; Lyell 1863) asks if the megafauna of newly colonized worlds was exterminated by human hunting, or whether other factors, such as changing climate, were decisive. Debate on this issue remains lively in Australia, because its harsh environmen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Webb, R. Esmée
Format: Analitica de revista
Language:English
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cab a2200000 a 4500
001 025453
003 UAHC_CL
005 20180807113806.0
008 050614b xx j 000 1 eng
952 |0 0  |1 0  |4 0  |6 ANTIQUITY_275_98_000000000000000  |7 0  |8 General  |9 51616  |a BC  |b BC  |c General  |d 2017-08-03  |l 0  |o ANTIQUITY-275/98  |p FICTICIO415  |r 2019-01-08 00:00:00  |t 1  |w 2017-08-03  |y REVA 
999 |c 25453  |d 25453 
040 |a UAHC_CL  |c UAHC_CL  |d UAHC_CL 
100 1 |a Webb, R. Esmée 
245 1 0 |a Megamarsupial extinction :  |b the carrying capacity argument /  |c R. Esmée Webb. 
500 |a Antiquity 72 (1999): 46Ð55 
520 |a An ancient and contentious debate in prehistory (Owen 1846; Lyell 1863) asks if the megafauna of newly colonized worlds was exterminated by human hunting, or whether other factors, such as changing climate, were decisive. Debate on this issue remains lively in Australia, because its harsh environments surely posed problems for very large mammals. A starting-point for this fresh look at megafaunal extinction was Flannery's (1994) adoption of the 'blitzkrieg' hypothesis, in which humanly caused kill-off was so rapid it left no decisive archaeological traces. 
653 |a ANTROPOLOGIA 
773 0 |t Anthropology Today.  |w 025359 
900 |a ANTIQUITY-275/98 
942 |c REVA  |2 ddc