Rosses Point revisited /

The re-evaluation of artefacts sometimes reveals a long history of misinterpretation. Here Peter Woodman re-assesses stone tools from western Ireland which have important lessons for how our personal biases influence our interpretation of lithic assemblages.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Woodman, Peter C.
Format: Analitica de revista
Language:English
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cab a2200000 a 4500
001 025475
003 UAHC_CL
005 20180807114616.0
008 050614b xx j 000 1 eng
952 |0 0  |1 0  |4 0  |6 ANTIQUITY_277_98_000000000000000  |7 0  |8 General  |9 51638  |a BC  |b BC  |c General  |d 2017-08-03  |l 0  |o ANTIQUITY-277/98  |p FICTICIO442  |r 2019-01-08 00:00:00  |t 1  |w 2017-08-03  |y REVA 
999 |c 25475  |d 25475 
040 |a UAHC_CL  |c UAHC_CL  |d UAHC_CL 
100 1 |a Woodman, Peter C. 
245 1 0 |a Rosses Point revisited /  |c Peter C. Woodman. 
500 |a Antiquity 72 (1999): 562Ð570 
520 |a The re-evaluation of artefacts sometimes reveals a long history of misinterpretation. Here Peter Woodman re-assesses stone tools from western Ireland which have important lessons for how our personal biases influence our interpretation of lithic assemblages. 
650 4 |a PALEOLITICO 
651 4 |a IRLANDA 
653 |a ANTROPOLOGIA 
773 0 |t Anthropology Today.  |w 025359 
900 |a ANTIQUITY-277/98 
942 |c REVA  |2 ddc