Comparative Politics : the State of the Subdiscipline /

In earlier decades, there was a consensus about a specific comparative method. It was differentiated from a statistical and from a case-study methodology, and it emphasized through the use of strategic controls the isolation of key variables that could explain variations in outcomes. However, Laitin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Otros Autores: Laitin, David
Formato: Libro
Lenguaje:inglés
Publicado: Standford University 2000
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Disponible en línea. Biblioteca Digital UAHC

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 a 4500
001 025730
003 UAHC_CL
005 20210909175930.0
008 120809b xx j 000 1 eng
040 |a UAHC_CL  |c UAHC_CL  |d UAHC_CL 
245 1 0 |a Comparative Politics :  |b the State of the Subdiscipline /  |c David Laitin. 
260 |c 2000  |b Standford University 
500 |a En: American Political Science Association 
520 |a In earlier decades, there was a consensus about a specific comparative method. It was differentiated from a statistical and from a case-study methodology, and it emphasized through the use of strategic controls the isolation of key variables that could explain variations in outcomes. However, Laitin argues that this consensus is no longer representative of the field. 
521 |a Sistemas Políticos Comparados 
653 |a CIENCIAS POLITICAS 
658 |a Vivanco, Jaime 
700 1 |a Laitin, David 
856 |u http://bibliotecadigital.academia.cl/xmlui/handle/123456789/605  |3 Disponible en línea. Biblioteca Digital UAHC  |y Disponible en línea. Biblioteca Digital UAHC 
900 |a ARTICULO ELECTRONICO 
942 |c BK 
999 |c 25730  |d 25730