The Chinese Discourse TreeBank: a Chinese corpus annotated with discourse relations.
The paper presents the Chinese Discourse TreeBank, a corpus annotated with Penn Discourse TreeBank style discourse relations that take the form of a predicate taking two arguments. We first characterize the syntactic and statistical distributions of Chinese discourse connectives as well as the role...
| Publicado en: | Language Resources & Evaluation Vol. 49; no. 2; pp. 397 - 432 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Jun2015
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=102481853&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 102481853 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 1574020X 179V jtl: Language Resources & Evaluation issn: 1574020X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jun2015 vid: 49 iid: 2 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 102481853 10.1007/s10579-014-9290-3 ppf: 397 ppct: 35 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 8.4MB tig: atl: The Chinese Discourse TreeBank: a Chinese corpus annotated with discourse relations. aug: au: Zhou, Yuping Xue, Nianwen affil: Brandeis University, Waltham USA su: Chinese language Annotations Semantics Natural language processing Linguistics sug: subj: Chinese language Annotations Semantics Natural language processing Linguistics keyword: Chinese Discourse relations Discourse TreeBank Explicit and implicit discourse connectives ab: The paper presents the Chinese Discourse TreeBank, a corpus annotated with Penn Discourse TreeBank style discourse relations that take the form of a predicate taking two arguments. We first characterize the syntactic and statistical distributions of Chinese discourse connectives as well as the role of Chinese punctuation marks in discourse annotation, and then describe how we design our annotation strategy procedure based on this characterization. The Chinese-specific features of our annotation strategy include annotating explicit and implicit discourse relations in one single pass, defining the argument labels on semantic, rather than syntactic, grounds, as well as annotating the semantic type of implicit discourse relations directly. We also introduce a flat, 11-valued semantic type classification scheme for discourse relations. We finally demonstrate the feasibility of our approach with evaluation results. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Language Resources & Evaluation is a copyright of Springer, 2015. All Rights Reserved. item: Language Resources & Evaluation holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2015 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|