Genomics for Nursing Education and Practice: Measuring Competency.
ABSTRACT Background Nurses lack genome literacy, skill, and self-confidence in applying genomics to health care. Standardized curricula and evaluation tools are needed for wide spread uptake and application of genome science in nursing education, practice, and research. Aim To determine whether psyc...
| Publicado en: | Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.) Vol. 12; no. 3; pp. 165 - 176 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Jun2015
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=103104883&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 103104883 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 17416787 NRNX jtl: Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.) issn: 17416787 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jun2015 vid: 12 iid: 3 pid: 52269 pub: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. artinfo: ui: 103104883 109799009 10.1111/wvn.12096 103104883 ppf: 165 ppct: 11 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Genomics for Nursing Education and Practice: Measuring Competency. aug: au: Anderson, Gwen Alt ‐ White, Anna C. Schaa, Kendra L. Boyd, Andrea M. Kasper, Christine E. affil: Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Nursing Services, Washington DC, USA sug: subj: Genomics Education, Nursing Clinical Competence Human Systematic Review Students, Nursing Nurses Medline CINAHL Database Meta Synthesis Descriptive Statistics Data Analysis Software ab: ABSTRACT Background Nurses lack genome literacy, skill, and self-confidence in applying genomics to health care. Standardized curricula and evaluation tools are needed for wide spread uptake and application of genome science in nursing education, practice, and research. Aim To determine whether psychometrically robust survey instruments exist to assess knowledge, skills, attitudes, and self-confidence in applying genomic nursing competency among students and registered nurses. Design Psychometric systematic review. Data Sources Medline, CINAHL, Academic Search Elite, Web of Science, and ProQuest Dissertations were searched from 1995 to 2014, with an English language restriction. Procedures Critical analysis of the study elements and psychometric attributes was conducted after data were abstracted into analysis and synthesis tables. The synthesis assessed the design, methods, and measurement properties with a focus on reliability and validity using 16 criteria on a 4-point grading scale. Findings Twelve studies were included in a detailed review that focused on assessment of genomic nursing core competencies. Six studies met the inclusion criteria. In terms of psychometric quality of the instruments, one study scored high, two moderate, two low, and one very low. Linking Evidence to Action Most instruments assess self-perceived rather than objectively assessed competency. The highest quality instrument lacks clinical application. Knowledge-focused test questions based on up-to-date genome science that are relevant to practice need to be developed. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|