The efficacy of terminology-extraction systems for the translation of documentaries.
This article investigates whether the integration of a domain-specific, bilingual glossary supports audiovisual translators of documentaries in terms of translation process time and terminological errors. After a short review of issues typical of documentary translation and a discussion of the use o...
| Publicado en: | Perspectives: Studies in Translatology Vol. 23; no. 3; pp. 359 - 375 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Sep2015
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=103644304&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 103644304 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0907676X S2F jtl: Perspectives: Studies in Translatology issn: 0907676X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Sep2015 vid: 23 iid: 3 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 103644304 10.1080/0907676X.2015.1010549 ppf: 359 ppct: 16 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 230KB tig: atl: The efficacy of terminology-extraction systems for the translation of documentaries. aug: au: Hanoulle, Sabien Hoste, Véronique Remael, Aline affil: Faculty of Arts, Department of Applied Linguistics, Translators & Interpreters, University of Antwerp, Belgium Faculty of Arts and Philosophy, Department of Applied Language Studies, Ghent University, Belgium su: Documentary films Dubbing of motion pictures Terms & phrases Corpora Linguistic analysis sug: subj: Documentary films Dubbing of motion pictures Terms & phrases Corpora Linguistic analysis keyword: audiovisual translation documentaries off-screen dubbing terminology-extraction systems translation-memory software ab: This article investigates whether the integration of a domain-specific, bilingual glossary supports audiovisual translators of documentaries in terms of translation process time and terminological errors. After a short review of issues typical of documentary translation and a discussion of the use of translation-memory software in general, the reference corpora are described. Next, a manually labeled glossary is created and its constitution is explained with special emphasis on the criteria used to qualify what a ‘term is, or is not’. This glossary is then used as a gold standard to calculate the rate of agreement with the glossary of three automatic terminology-extraction systems. Finally, experiments with Master's students demonstrate how both glossaries (the gold standard and one automatically extracted glossary) reduce their process time significantly but not the number of terminological errors. The article concludes with a discussion of the data analysis and by presenting the next step in this research, i.e. experiments with professional translators and further challenges such as a comparison between the glossaries. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Perspectives: Studies in Translatology is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Perspectives: Studies in Translatology holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd dt: @attributes: year: 2015 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|