Correlation of Respirator Fit Measured on Human Subjects and a Static Advanced Headform.

This study assessed the correlation of N95 filtering facepiece respirator (FFR) fit between a Static Advanced Headform (StAH) and 10 human test subjects. Quantitative fit evaluations were performed on test subjects who made three visits to the laboratory. On each visit, one fit evaluation was perfor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Occupational & Environmental Hygiene Vol. 12; no. 3; pp. 163 - 172
Autores principales: Bergman, Michael S., He, Xinjian, Joseph, Michael E., Zhuang, Ziqing, Heimbuch, Brian K., Shaffer, Ronald E., Choe, Melanie, Wander, Joseph D.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Mar2015
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:This study assessed the correlation of N95 filtering facepiece respirator (FFR) fit between a Static Advanced Headform (StAH) and 10 human test subjects. Quantitative fit evaluations were performed on test subjects who made three visits to the laboratory. On each visit, one fit evaluation was performed on eight different FFRs of various model/size variations. Additionally, subject breathing patterns were recorded. Each fit evaluation comprised three two-minute exercises: “Normal Breathing,” “Deep Breathing,” and again “Normal Breathing.” The overall test fit factors (FF) for human tests were recorded. The same respirator samples were later mounted on the StAH and the overall test manikin fit factors (MFF) were assessed utilizing the recorded human breathing patterns. Linear regression was performed on the mean log10-transformedFFandMFFvalues to assess the relationship between the values obtained from humans and the StAH. This is the first study to report a positive correlation of respirator fit between a headform and test subjects. The linear regression by respirator resulted inR2= 0.95, indicating a strong linear correlation betweenFFandMFF. For all respirators the geometric mean (GM)FFvalues were consistently higher than those of the GMMFF. For 50% of respirators, GMFFand GMMFFvalues were significantly different between humans and the StAH. For data grouped by subject/respirator combinations, the linear regression resulted inR2= 0.49. A weaker correlation (R2= 0.11) was found using only data paired by subject/respirator combination where both the test subject and StAH had passed a real-time leak check before performing the fit evaluation. For six respirators, the difference in passing rates between the StAH and humans was < 20%, while two respirators showed a difference of 29% and 43%. For data by test subject, GMFFand GMMFFvalues were significantly different for 40% of the subjects. Overall, the advanced headform system has potential for assessing fit for some N95 FFR model/sizes.