| Sumario: | Objectives: To evaluate CT aortography at reduced tube voltage and contrast medium dose while maintaining image quality through iterative reconstruction (IR).Methods: The Institutional Review Board approved a prospective study of 48 patients who underwent follow-up CT aortography. We performed intra-individual comparisons of arterial phase images using 120 kVp (standard tube voltage) and 80 kVp (low tube voltage). Low-tube-voltage imaging was performed on a 320-detector CT with IR following injection of 40 ml of contrast medium. We assessed aortic attenuation, aortic attenuation gradient, image noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), and figure of merit (FOM) of image noise and CNR. Two readers assessed images for diagnostic quality, image noise, and artefacts.Results: The low-tube-voltage protocol showed 23-31% higher mean aortic attenuation and image noise (both P < 0.01) than the standard-tube-voltage protocol, but no significant difference in the CNR and aortic attenuation gradients. The low-tube-voltage protocol showed a 48% reduction in CTDIvol and an 80% increase in FOM of CNR. Subjective diagnostic quality was similar for both protocols, but low-tube-voltage images showed greater image noise (P = 0.01).Conclusions: Application of IR to an 80-kVp CT aortography protocol allows radiation dose and contrast medium reduction without affecting image quality.Key Points: • CT aortography at 80 kVp allows a significant reduction in radiation dose. • Addition of iterative reconstruction reduces image noise and improves image quality. • The injected contrast medium dose can be substantially reduced at 80 kVp. • Aortic enhancement is uniform despite a reduced volume of contrast medium.
|
|---|