Clinically useful dilution factors for iodine and gadolinium contrast material: an animal model of pediatric digital subtraction angiography using state-of-the-art flat-panel detectors.

Background: Iodinated and gadolinium contrast agents pose some risk for certain pediatric patients, including allergic-like reactions, contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF). Digital flat-panel detectors enhance image quality during angiography and might allow use...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Pediatric Radiology Vol. 43; no. 11; pp. 1491 - 1502
Autores principales: Racadio, John M, Kashinkunti, Soumya R, Nachabe, Rami A, Racadio, Judy M, Johnson, Neil D, Kukreja, Kamlesh U, Patel, Manish N, Privitera, Mary Beth, Hales, Jasmine E, Abruzzo, Todd A
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Nov2013
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104106035&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104106035
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        03010449
        O03
      jtl: Pediatric Radiology
      issn: 03010449
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2013
      vid: 43
      iid: 11
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104106035
        NLM23736781
        2012342702
        10.1007/s00247-013-2723-0
        NLM23736781
        104106035
      ppf: 1491
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Clinically useful dilution factors for iodine and gadolinium contrast material: an animal model of pediatric digital subtraction angiography using state-of-the-art flat-panel detectors.
      aug:
        au:
          Racadio, John M
          Kashinkunti, Soumya R
          Nachabe, Rami A
          Racadio, Judy M
          Johnson, Neil D
          Kukreja, Kamlesh U
          Patel, Manish N
          Privitera, Mary Beth
          Hales, Jasmine E
          Abruzzo, Todd A
        affil: Department of Radiology, Division of Pediatric Interventional Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave., Cincinnati, OH, 45229-3030, USA, john.racadio@cchmc.org.
      sug:
        subj:
          Angiography, Digital Subtraction Equipment and Supplies
          Elements Administration and Dosage
          Elements Diagnostic Use
          Iodine Administration and Dosage
          Iodine Diagnostic Use
          Models, Biological
          Radiographic Image Enhancement
          Angiography, Digital Subtraction Methods
          Animal Studies
          Contrast Media
          Contrast Media Administration and Dosage
          Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
          Elements
          Equipment Design
          Equipment Failure
          Iodine
          Rabbits
          Reproducibility of Results
          Sensitivity and Specificity
      ab: Background: Iodinated and gadolinium contrast agents pose some risk for certain pediatric patients, including allergic-like reactions, contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF). Digital flat-panel detectors enhance image quality during angiography and might allow use of more dilute contrast material to decrease risk of complications that might be dose-dependent, such as CIN and NSF.Objective: To assess the maximum dilution factors for iodine- and gadolinium-based contrast agents suitable for vascular imaging with fluoroscopy and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) on digital flat-panel detectors in an animal model.Materials and Methods: We performed selective catheterization of the abdominal aorta, renal artery and common carotid artery on a rabbit. In each vessel we performed fluoroscopy and DSA during contrast material injection using iodinated and gadolinium contrast material at 100%, 80%, 50%, 33% and 20% dilutions. An image quality score (0 to 3) was assigned by each of eight evaluators. Intracorrelation coefficient, paired t-test, one-way repeated analysis of variance, Spearman correlation and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were applied to the data.Results: Overall the image quality scores correlated linearly with dilution levels. For iodinated contrast material, the optimum cut-off level for DSA when a score of at least 2 is acceptable is above 33%; it is above 50% when a score of 3 is necessary. For gadolinium contrast material, the optimum cut-off for DSA images is above 50% when a score of at least 2 is acceptable and above 80% when a score of 3 is necessary.Conclusion: Knowledge of the relationship between image quality and contrast material dilution might allow a decrease in overall contrast load while maintaining appropriate image quality when using digital flat-panel detectors.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N