An expanded typology of conflict at work: Task, relationship and non-task organizational conflict as social stressors.

This study investigated the roles of three types of conflict at work – task, relationship and non-task organizational – in predicting employee strain. These conflict types refer to disputes over issues that are, respectively, work-task specific, driven by emotionally charged interpersonal animosity...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Work & Stress Vol. 27; no. 4; pp. 339 - 351
Autores principales: Bruk-Lee, Valentina, Nixon, Ashley E., Spector, Paul E.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Oct-Dec2013
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:This study investigated the roles of three types of conflict at work – task, relationship and non-task organizational – in predicting employee strain. These conflict types refer to disputes over issues that are, respectively, work-task specific, driven by emotionally charged interpersonal animosity or rooted in more broad organizationally relevant issues. Findings from a sample of 260 working adults from various organizations in the United States supported the notion that the three types of conflict function as social stressors and are related to a variety of psychological, behavioural and physical strains. They extend previous research based primarily on relationship conflict. Non-task organizational conflict emerged as a key predictor across strain criteria, thus highlighting the importance of including a more complete conceptualization of the conflict construct in social stress research. The results for task conflict are at variance with findings that it can be beneficial, and suggest that its negative relationship with well-being may be due to its co-occurrence with the other forms of conflict. These findings provide support for an expanded typology of conflict.