A hinting strategy for online learning of radiograph interpretation by medical students.

Context We examined whether a 'hint' manoeuvre increases the time novice medical learners spend on reviewing a radiograph, thereby potentially increasing their interpretation accuracy. Methods Senior year medical students were recruited into a randomised control, three-arm, multicentre trial. Studen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Medical Education Vol. 47; no. 9; pp. 877 - 888
Autores principales: Boutis, Kathy, Pecaric, Martin, Shiau, Maria, Ridley, Jane, P Gladding, Sophie, S Andrews, John, V Pusic, Martin
Formato: pictorial research tables/charts randomized controlled trial Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Sep2013
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104211197&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104211197
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        03080110
        ESF
      jtl: Medical Education
      issn: 03080110
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2013
      vid: 47
      iid: 9
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104211197
        89658909
        10.1111/medu.12182
        NLM23931537
        104211197
      ppf: 877
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: A hinting strategy for online learning of radiograph interpretation by medical students.
      aug:
        au:
          Boutis, Kathy
          Pecaric, Martin
          Shiau, Maria
          Ridley, Jane
          P Gladding, Sophie
          S Andrews, John
          V Pusic, Martin
        affil: The Hospital for Sick Children
      sug:
        subj:
          Education, Medical
          Learning Methods
          Radiography
          Diagnostic Imaging Evaluation
          Models, Theoretical
          Outcomes of Education
          Human
          Funding Source
          Randomized Controlled Trials
          Multicenter Studies
          Descriptive Statistics
          Confidence Intervals
          Prospective Studies
          Data Collection, Computer Assisted
          Algorithms
          Coefficient alpha
          Pretest-Posttest Design
          Random Assignment
          Effect Size
          One-Way Analysis of Variance
          Post Hoc Analysis
          Students, Medical
      ab: Context We examined whether a 'hint' manoeuvre increases the time novice medical learners spend on reviewing a radiograph, thereby potentially increasing their interpretation accuracy. Methods Senior year medical students were recruited into a randomised control, three-arm, multicentre trial. Students reviewed an online 50-case learning set that varied in degree of 'hint' intervention. The 'hint' was a dialogue box that appeared after a student submitted an answer, encouraging the student to re-evaluate their interpretation. The students in the control group received no hints. In the weak intervention group, students received 'hints' with 66% of their incorrect interpretations and 33% of those that were correct. In the strong intervention group, the incorrect interpretation hint frequency was 80%, whereas for correct responses it was 20%. All students completed a 20-case post-test immediately and 2 weeks after the 50 cases. The primary outcome was student performance on the immediate post-test, measured as the ability to discriminate between normal and abnormal films (dPrime). Secondary outcomes included the probability of considering the hint, time spent on learning cases and knowledge retention at 2 weeks. Results We enrolled 117 medical students from three sites into the three study groups: control (36), weak intervention (40) and strong intervention (41) groups. The mean ( standard deviation) dPrime in the control, weak and strong groups were 0.4 (1.1), 0.7 (1.1) and 0.4 (0.9), respectively ( P = 0.4). In the weak and strong groups, participants reconsidered answers in 556 of 1944 (28.6%) hinting opportunities, and those who reconsidered their answers spent a mean (95% confidence interval) of 13.9 (11.9, 16.0) seconds longer on each case. There were no significant differences in knowledge retention at 2 weeks between the groups ( P = 0.2). Conclusions Although the implemented hinting strategy did result in students spending more time considering a proportion of the cases, overall it was not effective in improving student performance.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        randomized controlled trial
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N