Prevalence of abnormal cases in an image bank affects the learning of radiograph interpretation.

Medical Education 2012: 46: 289-298 Objectives Using a large image bank, we systematically examined how the use of different ratios of abnormal to normal cases affects trainee learning. Methods This was a prospective, double-blind, randomised, three-arm education trial conducted in six academic trai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Medical Education Vol. 46; no. 3; pp. 289 - 299
Autores principales: Pusic, Martin V, Andrews, John S, Kessler, David O, Teng, David C, Pecaric, Martin R, Ruzal-Shapiro, Carrie, Boutis, Kathy
Formato: research tables/charts randomized controlled trial Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Mar2012
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104515767&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104515767
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        03080110
        ESF
      jtl: Medical Education
      issn: 03080110
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2012
      vid: 46
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104515767
        71546723
        10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04165.x
        NLM22324528
        104515767
      ppf: 289
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Prevalence of abnormal cases in an image bank affects the learning of radiograph interpretation.
      aug:
        au:
          Pusic, Martin V
          Andrews, John S
          Kessler, David O
          Teng, David C
          Pecaric, Martin R
          Ruzal-Shapiro, Carrie
          Boutis, Kathy
        affil: Department of Paediatrics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA; Department of Paediatrics, New York University Langone Medical Center/Bellevue Hospital Center, New York University, New York, New York, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Picture Archiving and Communication Systems Methods
          Ankle Fractures Radiography
          Prevalence Evaluation
          Outcomes of Education
          Randomized Controlled Trials
          Random Assignment
          Double-Blind Studies
          Prospective Studies
          Internship and Residency
          Sensitivity and Specificity
          Descriptive Statistics
          Two-Way Analysis of Variance
          One-Way Analysis of Variance
          Post Hoc Analysis
          Effect Size
          Confidence Intervals
          Funding Source
          Coefficient alpha
          Software
          Outcomes Research
          Human
          Rasch Analysis
          Data Analysis Software
          Algorithms
          Interns and Residents
          Univariate Statistics
          Physicians Education
          Type II Error
      ab: Medical Education 2012: 46: 289-298 Objectives Using a large image bank, we systematically examined how the use of different ratios of abnormal to normal cases affects trainee learning. Methods This was a prospective, double-blind, randomised, three-arm education trial conducted in six academic training programmes for emergency medicine and paediatric residents in post-licensure years 2-5. We developed a paediatric ankle trauma radiograph case bank. From this bank, we constructed three different 50-case training sets, which varied in their proportions of abnormal cases (30%, 50%, 70%). Levels of difficulty and diagnoses were similar across sets. We randomly assigned residents to complete one of the training sets. Users classified each case as normal or abnormal, specifying the locations of any abnormalities. They received immediate feedback. All participants completed the same 20-case post-test in which 40% of cases were abnormal. We determined participant sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio and signal detection parameters. Results A total of 100 residents completed the study. The groups did not differ in accuracy on the post-test (p = 0.20). However, they showed considerable variation in their sensitivity-specificity trade-off. The group that received a training set with a high proportion of abnormal cases achieved the best sensitivity (0.69, standard deviation [SD] = 0.24), whereas the groups that received training sets with medium and low proportions of abnormal cases demonstrated sensitivities of 0.63 (SD = 0.21) and 0.51 (SD = 0.24), respectively (p < 0.01). Conversely, the group with a low proportion of abnormal cases demonstrated the best specificity (0.83, SD = 0.10) compared with the groups with medium (0.70, SD = 0.15) and high (0.66, SD = 0.17) proportions of abnormal cases (p < 0.001). The group with a low proportion of abnormal cases had the highest false negative rate and missed fractures one-third more often than the groups that trained on higher proportions of abnormal cases. Conclusions Manipulating the ratio of abnormal to normal cases in learning banks can have important educational implications.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        randomized controlled trial
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N