Educational technology -- mapping the terrain with Bernstein as cartographer.

This paper uses the literature of educational technology as the site of analysis in order to map the field of educational technology. Having considered Kuhn and Bourdieu's theories, the paper frames the analysis of the field in Bernsteinian terms as a horizontal knowledge structure in a vertical kno...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Computer Assisted Learning Vol. 26; no. 6; pp. 523 - 535
Main Author: Czerniewicz, L.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Wiley-Blackwell Dec2010
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104813130&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104813130
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02664909
        6M1
      jtl: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
      issn: 02664909
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2010
      vid: 26
      iid: 6
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104813130
        2010863255
        10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00359.x
        104813130
      ppf: 523
      ppct: 12
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Educational technology -- mapping the terrain with Bernstein as cartographer.
      aug:
        au: Czerniewicz, L.
        affil: University of Cape Town, South Africa
      sug:
        subj:
          Educational Technology
          Knowledge
          Conceptual Framework
          Learning Theory
      ab: This paper uses the literature of educational technology as the site of analysis in order to map the field of educational technology. Having considered Kuhn and Bourdieu's theories, the paper frames the analysis of the field in Bernsteinian terms as a horizontal knowledge structure in a vertical knowledge discourse. Using the concepts of interacting discursive planes, the paper maps the field in terms of its general approach planes and its problem planes. Finally, the paper shows that researchers in the field themselves acknowledge its weak grammar, and calls for commensurability of approaches to be acknowledged in order for robust knowledge to be developed and the legitimacy of the field to be enhanced.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N