Combined correction of recovery effect and motion blur for SUV quantification of solitary pulmonary nodules in FDG PET/CT.

Objective: We evaluate a fully data-driven method for the combined recovery and motion blur correction of small solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) in F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT).Methods: The SPN was segmented in the low-dose CT using a var...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:European Radiology Vol. 20; no. 8; pp. 1868 - 1878
Main Authors: Apostolova I, Wiemker R, Paulus T, Kabus S, Dreilich T, van den Hoff J, Plotkin M, Mester J, Brenner W, Buchert R, Klutmann S, Apostolova, Ivayla, Wiemker, Rafael, Paulus, Timo, Kabus, Sven, Dreilich, Thomas, van den Hoff, Jörg, Plotkin, Michail, Mester, Janos, Brenner, Winfried
Format: research Journal Article
Published: Springer Nature Aug2010
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
Description
Summary:Objective: We evaluate a fully data-driven method for the combined recovery and motion blur correction of small solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) in F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT).Methods: The SPN was segmented in the low-dose CT using a variable Hounsfield threshold and morphological constraints. The combined effect of limited spatial resolution and motion blur in the SPN's PET image was then modelled by an effective Gaussian point-spread function (psf). Both isotropic and non-isotropic psfs were used. To validate the method, PET/CT measurements of the NEMA/IEC spheres phantom were performed. The method was applied to 50 unselected SPNs <or=30 mm from routine patient care.Results: Recovery of standardised uptake value (SUV) in the phantom image was significantly improved by combined recovery and motion blur correction compared with recovery-only correction, particularly with the non-isotropic model (residual average error 10%). In the patient images, automated segmentation and fit of the effective psf worked properly in all cases. Volume-equivalent diameter ranged from 4.9 to 27.8 mm. Uncorrected maximum SUV ranged from 0.9 to 13.3. Compared with recovery-only correction, combined correction with the non-isotropic model resulted in a 'relevant' (>or=30%) SUV increase in 47 SPNs (94%).Conclusions: Correction of both recovery and motion blur is mandatory for accurate SUV quantification of SPNs.