Visualising knowledge from chat debates in argument diagrams.
This study investigates whether combining chat discussion and construction of an argument diagram stimulates students to formulate new ideas in practising argumentation. In this study, 16 secondary school students discussed vivisection and gender equality in pairs using both free and structured chat...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Computer Assisted Learning Vol. 26; no. 5; pp. 379 - 392 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Oct2010
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105012008&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 105012008 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 02664909 6M1 jtl: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning issn: 02664909 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Oct2010 vid: 26 iid: 5 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell place: Malden, Massachusetts artinfo: ui: 105012008 2010785608 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00354.x 105012008 ppf: 379 ppct: 13 formats: tig: atl: Visualising knowledge from chat debates in argument diagrams. aug: au: Salminen T Marttunen M Laurinen L affil: Department of Education, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35 (Viveca 157), FI-40014 University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland. Email: timo.salminen@jyu.fi sug: subj: Collaboration Communication Education Computer-Assisted Instruction Ethics Education Adolescence Animals, Laboratory Chi Square Test Communication Skills Feedback Finland Funding Source Human Kruskal-Wallis Test Mann-Whitney U Test Nonparametric Statistics Outcomes of Education Questionnaires Schools, Secondary Student Satisfaction Students, High School Summated Rating Scaling Women's Rights Education Adolescent: 13-18 years ab: This study investigates whether combining chat discussion and construction of an argument diagram stimulates students to formulate new ideas in practising argumentation. In this study, 16 secondary school students discussed vivisection and gender equality in pairs using both free and structured chat tools. In structured chat, the students selected and completed partial sentences provided by the computer. After the discussion, they jointly constructed either argument diagrams freely based on the previous discussions with an Internet tool or modified a diagram the computer had constructed automatically during the structured chat. The freely constructed diagrams contained more of the students' prior knowledge than the modified diagrams. However, the different types of diagrams did not differ significantly in breadth, depth, or balance of argumentation. Thus, free construction of argument diagrams seems to activate students to incorporate their prior knowledge into those diagrams. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|