Learning outcomes from a biomedical research course for second year osteopathic medical students.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: A ubiquitous dilemma in medical education continues to be whether and how to integrate research competencies into the predoctoral curriculum. Understanding research concepts is imbedded in the six core competencies for physicians, but predoctoral medical education typically doe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Osteopathic Medicine & Primary Care Vol. 4; pp. 7p - 8
Autores principales: Cruser A, Brown SK, Ingram JR, Podawiltz AL, Dubin BD, Colston JS, Bulik RJ
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105079456&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 105079456
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        17504732
        6BXA
      jtl: Osteopathic Medicine & Primary Care
      issn: 17504732
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2010
      vid: 4
      pid: 24147
      pub: BioMed Central
    artinfo:
      ui:
        105079456
        2010749880
        10.1186/1750-4732-4-4
        NLM20609258
        PMC2914734
        105079456
      ppf: 7p
      ppct: 1
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Learning outcomes from a biomedical research course for second year osteopathic medical students.
      aug:
        au:
          Cruser A
          Brown SK
          Ingram JR
          Podawiltz AL
          Dubin BD
          Colston JS
          Bulik RJ
        affil: University of North Texas Health Science Center, Texas College of Osteopathic Medicine, Fort Worth, Texas, USA; desAnges.cruser@unthsc.edu
      sug:
        subj:
          Course Evaluation
          Learning
          Osteopathic Medicine
          Research Education
          Students, Medical
          Academic Performance
          Adult
          Chi Square Test
          Course Content
          Data Analysis Software
          Descriptive Statistics
          Female
          Funding Source
          Human
          Male
          Pretest-Posttest Design
          Questionnaires
          T-Tests
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: A ubiquitous dilemma in medical education continues to be whether and how to integrate research competencies into the predoctoral curriculum. Understanding research concepts is imbedded in the six core competencies for physicians, but predoctoral medical education typically does not explicitly include research education. In an effort to quickly report academic research findings to the field, this is the second in a series of articles reporting the outcomes of a research education initiative at one college of osteopathic medicine. The first article described the competency model and reported baseline performance in applied understanding of targeted research concepts. This second article reports on the learning outcomes from the inaugural year of a course in basic biomedical research concepts. METHODS: This course consisted of 24 total hours of classroom lectures augmented with web-based materials using Blackboard Vista, faculty moderated student presentations of research articles, and quizzes. To measure changes in applied understanding of targeted research concepts in the inaugural year of the course, we administered a pretest and a posttest to second year students who took the course and to first year students who took an informatics course in the same academic year. RESULTS: We analyzed 154 matched pretests and posttests representing 56% of the 273 first and second year students. On average, the first year (53) and second year students (101) did not differ in their mean pretest scores. At posttest the second year students showed significant improvement in their applied understanding of the concepts, whereas the first year students' mean posttest score was lower than their mean pretest score. CONCLUSIONS: This biomedical research course appears to have increased the second year students' applied understanding of the targeted biomedical research concepts. This assessment of learning outcomes has facilitated the quality improvement process for the course, and improved our understanding of how to measure the benefits of research education for medical students. Some of the course content and methods, and the outcome measures may need to be approached differently in the future to more effectively lay the foundation for osteopathic medical students to utilize these concepts in the clinical setting.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N