Literacy learning in users of AAC: a neurocognitive perspective.
The understanding of written or printed text or discourse -- depicted either in orthographical, graphic-visual or tactile symbols -- calls upon both bottom-up word recognition processes and top-down comprehension processes. Different architectures have been proposed to account for literacy processes...
| Published in: | AAC: Augmentative & Alternative Communication Vol. 26; no. 3; pp. 149 - 158 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | tables/charts Journal Article |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Sep2010
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105111906&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 105111906 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 07434618 9OD jtl: AAC: Augmentative & Alternative Communication issn: 07434618 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Sep2010 vid: 26 iid: 3 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 105111906 2010807843 10.3109/07434618.2010.505610 NLM20874078 105111906 ppf: 149 ppct: 9 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Literacy learning in users of AAC: a neurocognitive perspective. aug: au: van Balkom H Verhoeven L affil: Behavioural Science Institute (BSI), Radboud University Nijmegen, PO Box 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands; h.vanbalkom@kentalis.nl; vbalkomh@xs4all.nl sug: subj: Language Processing Literacy Alternative and Augmentative Communication Cognition Neurophysiology ab: The understanding of written or printed text or discourse -- depicted either in orthographical, graphic-visual or tactile symbols -- calls upon both bottom-up word recognition processes and top-down comprehension processes. Different architectures have been proposed to account for literacy processes. Research has shown that the first steps in perceiving, processing and deriving conceptual meaning from words, graphic symbols, manual signs, and co-speech gestures or tactile manual signing and tangible symbols can be seen as identical and collectively (sub)activated. Results from recent brain research and neurolinguistics have revealed new insights in the reading process of typical and atypical readers and may provide verifiable evidence for improved literacy assessment and the validation of early intervention programs for AAC users. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|