Imagen de Portada
Código QR

The role of external validity in evidence-based practice for rehabilitation.

Objective: To advance a methodological convention that balances concern for rigor (i.e., internal validity) with equal concern for relevance (i.e., external validity). Method: Conceptual. Results: A rating format for relevance is derived, determined, and applied to cognitive rehabilitation. Implicat...

Descripción completa

Publicado en:Rehabilitation Psychology Vol. 53; no. 3; pp. 294 - 303
Autores principales: Schutz LE, Rivers KO, Ratusnik DL
Formato: tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: American Psychological Association Aug2008
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105669688&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 105669688
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00905550
        ILQ
      jtl: Rehabilitation Psychology
      issn: 00905550
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2008
      vid: 53
      iid: 3
      pid: 34
      pub: American Psychological Association
      place: Washington, District of Columbia
    artinfo:
      ui:
        105669688
        105669688
        2010003638
        10.1037/a0012923
        105669688
      ppf: 294
      ppct: 9
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: The role of external validity in evidence-based practice for rehabilitation.
      aug:
        au:
          Schutz LE
          Rivers KO
          Ratusnik DL
        affil: Communication Disorders Clinic, University of Central Florida, Suite 115, Research Pavilion, 12424 Research Parkway, Orlando, FL 32826; lschutz@mail.ucf.edu
      sug:
        subj:
          Clinical Trials
          Professional Practice, Evidence-Based
          Rehabilitation, Cognitive
          Study Design
          Validity
      ab: Objective: To advance a methodological convention that balances concern for rigor (i.e., internal validity) with equal concern for relevance (i.e., external validity). Method: Conceptual. Results: A rating format for relevance is derived, determined, and applied to cognitive rehabilitation. Implications: The evidentiary base for applying research to practice can be properly determined through expert analysis of multidimensional criteria. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved)
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N