Trial and error versus errorless learning of functional skills in patients with acute stroke.
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of errorless learning versus trial and error learning for teaching activities of daily living to patients with acute stroke with or without explicit memory impairments. Design: Randomized crossover. Setting: Rehabilitation hospital. Participants: Thirty-three...
| Publicado en: | NeuroRehabilitation Vol. 22; no. 2; pp. 123 - 133 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
| Formato: | clinical trial research Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Sage Publications Inc.
2007
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105996742&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 105996742 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 10538135 3RE jtl: NeuroRehabilitation issn: 10538135 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2007 vid: 22 iid: 2 pid: 344 pub: Sage Publications Inc. place: Thousand Oaks, California artinfo: ui: 105996742 105996742 2009637966 10.3233/nre-2007-22208 NLM17656838 105996742 ppf: 123 ppct: 10 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Trial and error versus errorless learning of functional skills in patients with acute stroke. aug: au: Mount J Pierce SR Parker J Diegidio R Woessner R Spiegel L sug: subj: Activities of Daily Living Cues Learning Stroke Rehabilitation Adult Aged Aged, 80 and Over Clinical Trials Crossover Design Female Male Memory Disorders Etiology Memory Middle Age Rehabilitation Methods Stroke Complications Stroke Psychosocial Factors Treatment Outcomes Human Adult: 19-44 years Aged: 65+ years Aged, 80 & over Middle Aged: 45-64 years Female Male ab: Objective: To compare the effectiveness of errorless learning versus trial and error learning for teaching activities of daily living to patients with acute stroke with or without explicit memory impairments. Design: Randomized crossover. Setting: Rehabilitation hospital. Participants: Thirty-three adult subjects following an acute stroke. Intervention: Subjects were taught to prepare a wheelchair for a transfer and to put on a sock with a sock-donner. Tasks were taught using errorless learning or trial and error learning. Explicit memory was assessed using the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Exam. Main Outcome Measures: Days until subject was able to demonstrate retention of the task, and success or failure at carry-over to a similar task. Results: No significant differences were found in days to retention for either functional task when taught using errorless learning or trial and error learning in subjects with or without explicit memory impairments. Carry-over was significantly better when trial and error learning was used for learning sock donning. Conclusions: When choosing the best learning method for patients undergoing rehabilitation for stroke, the nature of the task should be considered. Additional research is needed to identify the best approach for teaching activities of daily living and facilitating carry-over of learning in individuals with acute stroke. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: clinical trial research Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|