Counting span and the identification of primary language impairment.

Background: In recent research, verbal working memory has been proposed as a primary area of deficit for children with language impairment (LI), and therefore a source of more sensitive assessment measures. In addition, research on non-linguistic tasks has suggested that children with LI may have de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders Vol. 42; no. 3; pp. 349 - 366
Autores principales: Danahy K, Windsor J, Kohnert K
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell May2007
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106151420&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 106151420
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13682822
        B7U
      jtl: International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
      issn: 13682822
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2007
      vid: 42
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        106151420
        106151420
        2009589461
        10.1080/13682820600940083
        NLM17514546
        106151420
      ppf: 349
      ppct: 17
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Counting span and the identification of primary language impairment.
      aug:
        au:
          Danahy K
          Windsor J
          Kohnert K
        affil: Department of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, University of Minnesota. Minneapolis, MN.
      sug:
        subj:
          Language Disorders Diagnosis
          Memory In Infancy and Childhood
          Verbal Behavior In Infancy and Childhood
          Adolescence
          Age Factors
          Analysis of Covariance
          Case Control Studies
          Child
          Comparative Studies
          Correlation Coefficient
          Descriptive Statistics
          Funding Source
          Language Tests
          Multilingualism
          Post Hoc Analysis
          Regression
          Human
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Child: 6-12 years
      ab: Background: In recent research, verbal working memory has been proposed as a primary area of deficit for children with language impairment (LI), and therefore a source of more sensitive assessment measures. In addition, research on non-linguistic tasks has suggested that children with LI may have deficits that extend beyond the linguistic domain. These dual lines of research can be connected to the drive for non-biased assessment tasks for children with diverse language learning experiences (such as bilingual children), because linguistic tasks may be intrinsically biased against such children. Aims: To investigate the usefulness of a working-memory task with a minimal linguistic load as a potential screening tool for children with primary LI. Methods & Procedures: Three groups of children aged 7;10-13;11 participated in the study: monolingual English-speaking children with LI, typical monolingual English-speaking children, and typical Spanish-English bilingual children with several years of English experience. Performance of the three groups on the Counting Span task was explored through group comparisons and likelihood ratios. Outcomes & Results: Children with LI had significantly lower Counting Span Set score accuracy than either typical group, with the monolingual and bilingual groups showing equivalent task performance. However, results from likelihood ratios showed that Counting Span accuracy did not have compelling diagnostic power when the entire age group was considered. Children with less than 67% accuracy were only three times more likely to be from the LI group than from either of the two typical groups. In addition to language status (typical or LI), chronological age was a key contributor to Counting Span performance in this age group. Likelihood ratios for children aged 10;0 and above showed that children with less than 67% accuracy were nine times more likely to come from the LI group than the typical groups. Conclusions: This intermediate diagnostic ability suggests that performance on the Counting Span alone is insufficient to identify LI among linguistically diverse learners. However, Counting Span may be a very useful component of a larger LI assessment battery, particularly for children over the age of 10;0.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N