Manual versus digital radiographic measurements in acetabular dysplasia.

The intraobserver and interobserver variability of common radiographic measurements associated with hip dysplasia from plain and digital radiographs was assessed. Only the interobserver reliability of measuring Hilgenreiner's distance was found to be potentially clinically significant. The average S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Orthopedics Vol. 29; no. 8; pp. 724 - 727
Autores principales: Halanski MA, Noonan KJ, Hebert M, Nemeth BA, Mann DC, Leverson G, Halanski, Mathew A, Noonan, Kenneth J, Hebert, Mathew, Nemeth, Blaise A, Mann, David C, Leverson, Glen
Formato: diagnostic images research Journal Article
Publicado: SLACK Incorporated Aug2006
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:The intraobserver and interobserver variability of common radiographic measurements associated with hip dysplasia from plain and digital radiographs was assessed. Only the interobserver reliability of measuring Hilgenreiner's distance was found to be potentially clinically significant. The average Spearman correlation coefficients between groups were 0.81 acetabular index, 0.80 medial teardrop to medial metaphysis distance, and 0.77 Hilgenreiner's distance. The average difference between digital and plain radiographs was acetabular index 0.97 +/- 0.6 degrees, medial teardrop to medial metaphysis distance 0.5 +/- 0.56 mm, and Hilgenreiner's distance 0.41 +/- 0.78 mm. These values are clinically insignificant; therefore, digital radiographs are as reliable as conventional radiographs in assessing hip dysplasia.