Clinical forum. Conceptual versus monolingual scoring: when does it make a difference?

Purpose: This study evaluates the extent to which bilingual children produce the same or overlapping responses on tasks assessing semantic skills in each of their languages and whether classification analysis based on monolingual or conceptual scoring can accurately classify the semantic development...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools Vol. 36; no. 3; pp. 188 - 208
Autores principales: Bedore LM, Peña ED, García M, Cortez C
Formato: CEU exam questions research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Jul2005
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106412744&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 106412744
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01611461
        LSH
      jtl: Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools
      issn: 01611461
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2005
      vid: 36
      iid: 3
      pid: 42
      pub: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
      place: Rockville, Maryland
    artinfo:
      ui:
        106412744
        106412744
        2009090630
        10.1044/0161-1461(2005/020)
        NLM16175883
        106412744
      ppf: 188
      ppct: 20
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Clinical forum. Conceptual versus monolingual scoring: when does it make a difference?
      aug:
        au:
          Bedore LM
          Peña ED
          García M
          Cortez C
        affil: Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712; lbedore@mail.utexas.edu
      sug:
        subj:
          Multilingualism In Infancy and Childhood
          Speech and Language Assessment
          Analysis of Variance
          Child
          Child, Preschool
          Comparative Studies
          Descriptive Statistics
          Education, Continuing (Credit)
          English as a Second Language
          Funding Source
          Hispanic Americans
          Language Tests
          Post Hoc Analysis
          Repeated Measures
          Human
          Child: 6-12 years
          Child, Preschool: 2-5 years
      ab: Purpose: This study evaluates the extent to which bilingual children produce the same or overlapping responses on tasks assessing semantic skills in each of their languages and whether classification analysis based on monolingual or conceptual scoring can accurately classify the semantic development of typically developing (TD) bilingual children. Method: In Study 1, 55 TD children (ages 4;0 [years;months] to 7;11) from bilingual backgrounds named characteristic properties of familiar items. The extent to which children produced overlapping responses in each of their languages and their errors were examined. In Study 2, 40 TD children (ages 5;0 to 6;1), group matched for age and bilingual language exposure, responded to the Phase 2 version of the Bilingual English Spanish Assessment (BESA; E. D. Peña, V. Gutierrez-Clellen, A. Iglesias, B. A. Goldstein, & L. M. Bedore, in development). Conceptual and monolingual scores were compared to determine the extent to which LSHSS T these were comparable for groups of children. Results: The results of Study 1 indicated that TD children from bilingual backgrounds are more likely to produce unique than overlapping responses when they respond to test items. Children were more likely to code switch when tested in Spanish than in English, but they were more likely to produce errors in English. In Study 2, monolingual and bilingual children achieved comparable conceptual scores. For Spanish-speaking bilingual children, the conceptual score was more likely to be in the average range of the monolingual children than was their monolingual score. For testing in English, monolingual and conceptual scores were similar. Clinical Implications: Bilingual children will benefit from conceptual scoring, especially when they are tested in Spanish.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        CEU
        exam questions
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N