Socratic strategies and devil's advocacy in synchronous CMC debate.

Within a synchronous computer-mediated discussion, teachers used a prescriptive framework of Socratic interventions together with dialogue moves which challenged students to justify their opinions or which presented a 'devil's advocate' line of counter-argument. This paper examines the effectiveness...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Computer Assisted Learning Vol. 20; no. 3; pp. 172 - 183
Autor principal: Walker SA
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jun2004
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106608088&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 106608088
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02664909
        6M1
      jtl: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
      issn: 02664909
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2004
      vid: 20
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        106608088
        106608088
        2005065995
        10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00082.x
        106608088
      ppf: 172
      ppct: 11
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Socratic strategies and devil's advocacy in synchronous CMC debate.
      aug:
        au: Walker SA
        affil: School of Education, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK; S.A.Walker@education.leeds.ac.uk
      sug:
        subj:
          Teaching Methods
          Communication Methods
          Computers and Computerization
          Computer-Assisted Instruction
          Qualitative Studies
          Female
          Male
          Human
          Female
          Male
      ab: Within a synchronous computer-mediated discussion, teachers used a prescriptive framework of Socratic interventions together with dialogue moves which challenged students to justify their opinions or which presented a 'devil's advocate' line of counter-argument. This paper examines the effectiveness of different teacher strategies and presents examples of those strategies in use. The research found that, although teachers used relatively few 'counter-argument' moves, these moves could be particularly successful in encouraging students to develop and defend a line of argument.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N